“LOL...well my knowledge of the Law is Nil, but my impression is that LittleMix entered into a legally binding agreement with the mother to produce a signer for the concert.
This they failed to do for the whole of the concert ( if that was the "deal") and hence the mother feels that she needs some "Recompense"
That's it really.”
But that isn’t why she’s taking the matter to court, sqad. As I understand it, she’s doing so not for breach of contract but under the Equalities Act. She is alleging that the promoters breached that law.
“Is that from your experiences attending shows and concerts with deaf people? (Though you didn't answer when I asked you this before)”
Sorry I ignored you. I have no experience of attending pop concerts with deaf people. It may make a difference and some promoters have taken that on board by providing signers. But that does not make it an obligation under the Equalities Act.
There are elements among disability rights campaigners who seem to misinterpret the law. The law says that “…any organisation supplying a service to the public is under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to ensure that a disabled person's experience is as close as possible to that of someone without a disability”. It does not say they must make any adjustments that anybody else sees fit. Providing signers as a matter of course is not (again in my view) a reasonable adjustment. Providing them whenever somebody asks is similarly not reasonable. Further than that, providing them on the basis that it will make the experience “…as close as possible to that of someone without a disability” is highly subjective. But as I said, the matter needs testing in court and I hope it is.