News2 mins ago
So Should The Eu Be Congratulating Putin On "winning" The Election?
16 Answers
Surely the best thing to do in the circumstances is to just keep quiet?
Ignoring the Salisbury incident clearly there were some dodgy goings on in the election.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-55 22407/J uncker- congrat ulates- Putin-d espite- Salisbu ry-nerv e-agent -outrag e.html
Ignoring the Salisbury incident clearly there were some dodgy goings on in the election.
http://
Answers
"Putin Wins Election" ... in other news ... Pope Still Catholic Bears Still Refusing to Use Indoor Facilities
14:30 Tue 20th Mar 2018
Meaningless diplo-speak I should think/hope, although wishing him "every success" is a bit much: what, here's hoping the next dose of nerve agent will be a bit stronger? May the stranglers leave a fainter trace of their work on the necks of their victims next time?
In all honesty, the dodgy things that went on on election day are not really the point: Putin would have won anyway. Russia has no political system to speak of and Putin is the enemy of the west. That is more to the point.
In all honesty, the dodgy things that went on on election day are not really the point: Putin would have won anyway. Russia has no political system to speak of and Putin is the enemy of the west. That is more to the point.
-- answer removed --
"
I still dont get why the election day fraud though, it just wasn't needed or is it so ingrained into the ex-KGB that they feel they have to do it? "
I think you're right ymb. Also, Putin was desperate to win big, with a high percentage and a high turnout.
It makes me smile when I hear observers say they "saw no irregularities". Unless you are with the boxes on the way to the count, and beyond, you cannot possibly tell what goes on.
Does anyone see the votes being counted I wonder?
As for "poking the bear" I am struggling to see how Britain was doing that. A lot of what the Kremlin does I'm convinced is deliberately to rile the west: provoke a reaction (a classic case being NATO troops to the Baltic states etc) and then claim the west is being hostile. These actions do play into their hands, but they have to be taken.
I still dont get why the election day fraud though, it just wasn't needed or is it so ingrained into the ex-KGB that they feel they have to do it? "
I think you're right ymb. Also, Putin was desperate to win big, with a high percentage and a high turnout.
It makes me smile when I hear observers say they "saw no irregularities". Unless you are with the boxes on the way to the count, and beyond, you cannot possibly tell what goes on.
Does anyone see the votes being counted I wonder?
As for "poking the bear" I am struggling to see how Britain was doing that. A lot of what the Kremlin does I'm convinced is deliberately to rile the west: provoke a reaction (a classic case being NATO troops to the Baltic states etc) and then claim the west is being hostile. These actions do play into their hands, but they have to be taken.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.