ChatterBank7 mins ago
Beating Fraud At The Ballot Box
I have no problem being asked for ID before voting, but I can understand that not everyone actually has a bank card or even a current passport.
What are your thoughts?
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/news/ uk/poli tics/lo cal-ele ctions- latest- voters- denied- right-i d-check -identi ficatio n-polli ng-stat ions-lo ndon-a8 334306. html
What are your thoughts?
https:/
Answers
No vote here today. Something needs to be done to ensure voting fraud is eliminated pretty much totally. Not only at the ballot box but also the issues of postal votes and people who vote twice. If the system is seen to be corrupt then it is the road to civil unrest.
11:55 Thu 03rd May 2018
TCL: "TTT, you approve of the many being affected by the actions of the very few in this instance? " - not sure which is which but how did we cope before 2001 when St Tony enabled corrupt block voting? Perhaps there should be a system for registered disabled etc to vote by post, bit like the forces but there is no reason to have it available for the masses.
"and what about people who will be away from home on holiday / for work etc? " - well clearly voting is not their priority.
Danny: "TTT, glad to see that you are not prejudiced against the disabled. " - of course I am not, but postal voting is bent as a butchers hook, I'm happy for special arrangments for the disabled but not so Labour can secure their corralled block vote.
Danny: "TTT, glad to see that you are not prejudiced against the disabled. " - of course I am not, but postal voting is bent as a butchers hook, I'm happy for special arrangments for the disabled but not so Labour can secure their corralled block vote.
//Why Kromo?//
I can't really justify it, I just find the idea a bit overbearing and invasive. It's like a license to walk the street. It's a one way ticket too - once they're properly introduced there's essentially no going back, and at a time when the state harvests and monitors truly vast and unprecedented amounts of information about its citizens it makes me uncomfortable.
I can't really justify it, I just find the idea a bit overbearing and invasive. It's like a license to walk the street. It's a one way ticket too - once they're properly introduced there's essentially no going back, and at a time when the state harvests and monitors truly vast and unprecedented amounts of information about its citizens it makes me uncomfortable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.