Donate SIGN UP

Was This In Effect Murder?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 19:40 Thu 17th May 2018 | News
28 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-44159192
The court says not but I wonder if the savage was in effect directly responsible for his death. Devastating case.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 28rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Horrendous, I can understand the difficulty the Jury may have had in this case.
In law there has to be the 'intent' to murder. The Prosecution were not able to establish that in this case no matter how reckless her actions were.

I hope that the law-makers can address circumstances such as these and find a solution which feels more like Justice.
She didn't murder him but she destroyed him. I hope she gets a very long term in prison when she is sentenced next week.
For what he suffered before his death, she should be locked up for a very long time. Bearing in mind, these days, the sentence for murder often ends up with the killer walking free after a relatively short time, I expect she will be out on the streets, probably selling her story, before long.
Wicked woman. Perhaps if he had been allowed to suffer agony for a while longer and died, she could have been rightly convicted of murder. I cannot imagine what he and his family, or the medical staff had to endure, I can but hope that she deservedly feels some of their pain...…...somehow.
It's not clear to me whether she was found not guilty of murder because that was not her intent or whether it's because the victim chose assisted suicide.
-- answer removed --
Not quite, JTH. The mens rea for murder is intent to kill or intent to cause GBH.
The latter, Corby. Throwing acid at someone would show sufficient intent to cause GBH and support a charge of murder. However taking his own life broke the chain of causation.
From the link, "If the jury had found Berlinah Wallace had thrown the acid intending to kill or seriously harm Mark Van Dongen, and that her act was a significant cause of his death, it would have been open to them to find her guilty of murder."

If the suicide breaks the chain, why would the CPS have considered a murder charge?
you can't convict anyone of murder or manslaughter when the dead man killed himself; I'm surprised they even tried. "Driving someone to suicide" isn't an offence. Still, I hope the sentence is long.
I agree with jno. Surprised they went with a murder charge.
Hope it's deported after serving it's sentence.
I wonder how many people with HIV/AIDS 'wash up' here?
Just another example of the CPS's sheer incompetence, showing them to be not fit for purpose.
yes i believe it was, what a terrible case, i hope she goes to jail for a very long time.
Certainly manslaughter I would think, no intention to kill so I can't see murder.
The Government needs to get a grip on these acid attacks.

Make a law specifically for them - mandatory 25 years no parole and no time off.

Judging by recent judgements I doubt we will see any justice in this case, just like the case of the woman too clever to go to jail for stabbing etc.
It's true that he'd still be alive if she hadn't thrown the acid on him, but unfortunately that doesn't make it murder, or even manslaughter in a legal sense.

I agree with youngmaf that this really needs cracking down on quickly. I can't think of any worse crime than deliberately disfiguring someone like this, other than murder.

Unfortunately I predict an inadequate sentence - even though it may be the maximum for whatever the actual conviction - which will not be served, because she'll be let out early anyway.
Being discussed on Jeremy Vine right now....
-- answer removed --

1 to 20 of 28rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Was This In Effect Murder?

Answer Question >>