Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 187rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
Jackie@12.55.Err no they weren't. The Zulus were not 'fighting the invaders of their land'. In fact, Shaka Zulu was himself and expansionist Imperialist. The Zulu Empire he led in the 19th century forced out many other African tribes from the regions of their ancient settlement. Under his rule, the Zulus killed and enslaved other black South Africans of...
12:14 Tue 26th Jun 2018
No.
No, it shouldn't be banned.
Question Author
Ask a question and get a simple 'YES' or 'NO'.

Do not ask a question and get 'WHAT'S YOUR QUESTION?
well I wouldn't ban the film but I wouldn't go to see it even to support a charity.
PS I don't consider it to be superb or even passable...saw it when it was new didn't think much of it then, haven't changed my opinion.
No! According to census records the population of Folkestone was in 2011 around 47,000 – probably more now….. and the 28 people who want this film banned are being taken seriously. Society needs to get a grip and advise the terminally precious to take a hike!
The few dictating to the many – and getting away with it - again.
but publicising what those 28 have done has given masses of free advertising for the showing!
Fabulous film.....Battle of Rorke's Drift........great.
No it shouldn't be banned as it is a part of the history of South Africa.
No of course not, films generally should not be banned especially if it's because people don't like the subject matter. I'm not a fan of anything which alters history or gags creativity whatever it is.
As Naomi has written.
28 people signed to have the event scrapped, that’s 28 people out of over 65 million people in uk, I can see why this is news, very fascinating stuff
Definitely not,
Unfortunately Steg in this day and age 28 whinging snowflakes have more clout than 65 Million
NO!
the film was remastered for its 50th anniversary in 2014. the special screening arranged for the anniversary was attended by Zulu Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi, who played his own great-grandfather in the film.

wouldn't you think a Zulu prince would have a better understanding of whether the film was racist, rather than a millennial snowflake from kent?
28 whinging snowflakes have more clout than 65 Million

really? Exactly what clout have they got?
jno, not the clout they deserve.
28 whinging snowflakes only have an influence when newspapers give them oxygen.
Question Author
Perhaps to equalise matters they should also show Zulu Dawn which illustrates the massacre of 1,800 British soldiers and 400 civilians, by a hordes of 20,000 Zulu savages.
Is a 'hoarde' officially 20,000 then?

1 to 20 of 187rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should The Superb Film Zulu Be Banned?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.