ChatterBank5 mins ago
Why Are The Liberals So Nasty When They Don't Get Their Own Way?
66 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/w orld-us -canada -446204 12
The US is doing well under the Trumpster yet the anti democracy brigade are getting increasingly nasty.
The US is doing well under the Trumpster yet the anti democracy brigade are getting increasingly nasty.
Answers
I guess giving over the top ridiculous answers Kvalidir means yo uno longer have a reasonable argument. Unfortunatel y the Lefty liberals have a habit of doing this and not only in the US. They cannot bear to loose because in their eyes there is no alternative to their view. In the US it is a stupid thing to do. If they want to win the next POTUS they need to start...
15:03 Sun 01st Jul 2018
TTT
You began by saying that the U.S. was doing well under Trump. Surely you realise that in the first year of a presidency, the health of the nation has nothing to do with the present incumbent right?
By the way, do you think that the American Right are likewise getting a bit nasty? Y'know - like the ones who marched on Charlottesville? Like the ones who marched screaming their thoughts about Jews?
Or is it just Liberal America?
Do you think that the American President is trying to unite the country?
Or do you think that he's using Twitter-democracy to pit one faction against another?
I am being serious here...I think you're talking cobblers. I'm not trying to be nasty, but when someone talks balls, it's only right that you call them out on it. You've got this platonic love for Trump, practically going all onanist when he won the election which is cute and all...but surely you can see that he's...not completely right.
You began by saying that the U.S. was doing well under Trump. Surely you realise that in the first year of a presidency, the health of the nation has nothing to do with the present incumbent right?
By the way, do you think that the American Right are likewise getting a bit nasty? Y'know - like the ones who marched on Charlottesville? Like the ones who marched screaming their thoughts about Jews?
Or is it just Liberal America?
Do you think that the American President is trying to unite the country?
Or do you think that he's using Twitter-democracy to pit one faction against another?
I am being serious here...I think you're talking cobblers. I'm not trying to be nasty, but when someone talks balls, it's only right that you call them out on it. You've got this platonic love for Trump, practically going all onanist when he won the election which is cute and all...but surely you can see that he's...not completely right.
Here's my thought...never before have we lived during a time when people have been so against each other...people from the same country.
Think about the U.S. What we are seeing right now is a repeat of America during the Civil Rights / Vietnam era. America has never been so split. People who blame liberals for this, ignoring what the American Right / neo-cons, Briebart-hangers, American Family Foundation and A Million Moms are doing are looking at this with one eye shut.
They should not be trusted, if they insist that the hatred is coming from one side.
That...is...cobblers.
Think about the U.S. What we are seeing right now is a repeat of America during the Civil Rights / Vietnam era. America has never been so split. People who blame liberals for this, ignoring what the American Right / neo-cons, Briebart-hangers, American Family Foundation and A Million Moms are doing are looking at this with one eye shut.
They should not be trusted, if they insist that the hatred is coming from one side.
That...is...cobblers.
//By the way, do you think that the American Right are likewise getting a bit nasty?//
Yes. But.
You compare the actions of the "liberals" (I use the word in its American sense of lefits/progressive), and compare them with those of the Right.
And you you apply a sense of proportion to your assessment. Like you don't equate the mass demonstrations of Antifa and Black Lives Matter with some withered branch of the KKK. You ask "How many?" and "How few?".
Here's a simple test: how much does it cost in security if a conservative like Milo Yiannopoulos speaks at a univeristy (assuming he's allowed to speak in the first place)? And how much does it cost in security if a radical leftist speaks?
Answer that question truthfully, and then tell me who's the fascist.
Yes. But.
You compare the actions of the "liberals" (I use the word in its American sense of lefits/progressive), and compare them with those of the Right.
And you you apply a sense of proportion to your assessment. Like you don't equate the mass demonstrations of Antifa and Black Lives Matter with some withered branch of the KKK. You ask "How many?" and "How few?".
Here's a simple test: how much does it cost in security if a conservative like Milo Yiannopoulos speaks at a univeristy (assuming he's allowed to speak in the first place)? And how much does it cost in security if a radical leftist speaks?
Answer that question truthfully, and then tell me who's the fascist.
v_e
You're kidding right?
What about what Dr. Bill Deagle threatened earlier this week?
Or what American anti-abortionists have done and continue to do across America?
Or the overthrow of Rose vs. Wade?
Or the ongoing protests about the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling?
And let's not forget the so-called birther movement. Blimey - they banged on for six years, because it so offended them that Barack Obama was elected.
You asked me to comment on how much it costs to protect Milo Yiannopoulos as opposed to a left-leaning speaker.
It's $40 to protect Milo and $1.5million to defend left leaning speakers against right wing thugs.
I made that up.
I don't know.
Nor do you.
It may be that Milo needs more protection. I think that might be right, because he's an odious turd, and young people tend to lean to the left...
You're kidding right?
What about what Dr. Bill Deagle threatened earlier this week?
Or what American anti-abortionists have done and continue to do across America?
Or the overthrow of Rose vs. Wade?
Or the ongoing protests about the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling?
And let's not forget the so-called birther movement. Blimey - they banged on for six years, because it so offended them that Barack Obama was elected.
You asked me to comment on how much it costs to protect Milo Yiannopoulos as opposed to a left-leaning speaker.
It's $40 to protect Milo and $1.5million to defend left leaning speakers against right wing thugs.
I made that up.
I don't know.
Nor do you.
It may be that Milo needs more protection. I think that might be right, because he's an odious turd, and young people tend to lean to the left...
And here's another test. A very simple one. This time it's not about violence, but about civility and double standards.
Katie Hopkins does a photo-shoot holding aloft the severed "head" of Sadiq Khan.
Your personal[i reaction?
Your best guess of the reaction in the media? (I'll include social media like AB in that).
Your best guess about what the police might do in reaction to this lapse of taste? Anything? Nothing?
Look me in the eye. Answer [i]honestly].
Katie Hopkins does a photo-shoot holding aloft the severed "head" of Sadiq Khan.
Your personal[i reaction?
Your best guess of the reaction in the media? (I'll include social media like AB in that).
Your best guess about what the police might do in reaction to this lapse of taste? Anything? Nothing?
Look me in the eye. Answer [i]honestly].
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.