Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 44rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
He could of course claimed that the pig represented Gammon Trump.
"Accidentally tweeted"? My aris!
" I accidentally Tweeted " will long be remembered as a cop out for many I fear.
Is that mop on head a wig?
Yeah, mamy, just like 'Fake news' and 'mis-spoke'.
//aying he "stupidly tweeted it in a meeting without checking it properly"//
No mention of it being an accident.
Is that on a bicycle?
LOL.
Question Author
There actually is mention of it being an accident, danny.
Sorry Talbot,couldn't read the small print.Must go to Specsavers.
Looks like clear He also said this //well bug isn’t the bigger case against him The 68-year-old has caused anger with his tweets previously, and had to apologise in one instance after saying he would punch a female journalist "in the throat" if he was ever on a talk show with her.//

So it looks like that he’s an islamaphobic, sexist and homophobic bigot who my guess is that he’s possibly also a racist but I have no proof just a personal hunch but isn’t the bigger story here is that he was at a meeting, a PAID meeting no doubt and one where as an Mp it was possible that whatever was being discussed was was of a life changing or country changing nature and instead of concentrating on the issues at hand he decided to give his full attention to using photoshop and and Twitter?


//Lichfield MP Mr Fabricant said: "Because I was distracted in a meeting and saw it on a tiny iPhone screen, I didn't spot what it really was.//

Well a 4.7” screen is ample for everyone else with an iPhone so clearly a liar as well?

He should be cordially invited to leave his position of trust immediately imo.
"I accidentally tweeted a vile picture.................." First sentence of his letter, Danny. D'you think i made it up?
For anyone who wants to see the image in question, you can do so here:

https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/13/outrage-michael-fabricant-mp-tweets-sexual-photo-sadiq-khan-pig-7712382/

I have to say I was expecting something far worse having read all the furore.
Ken, check my post at 14;48.
I mean, it's a bit embarassing in an 'old person tries to make a meme' sort of way. But I don't really understand the outrage.
Danny, busy typing my response when you were posting:-/ And my response may have been a tad curt, shall we say, but i'm not one of those who misquotes. I leave that to our politicians :-)
//But I don't really understand the outrage.//

Really? So if it was a Jewish Mayor and this same image depicted the Jewish mayor being raped by a pig as this one depicts sidiq or was a being raped by a nazi soldier would that be acceptable in your opinion?
To be clear, when you say "raped by a pig", you mean it shows a balloon of Khan with a balloon pig on his back in a slightly suggestive mounting position.

At the very worst, it's a bit dumb and unoriginal. I really can't say it makes me angry though...

I saw much worse (and much funnier tbh) images of Cameron during Piggate.
//To be clear, when you say "raped by a pig", you mean it shows a balloon of Khan with a balloon pig on his back in a slightly suggestive mounting position. //

And as a Muslim I’m pretty sure sidiq wouldn’t have been a consenting partner.

It is offensive, Fabricant knew this, the public know this and the whole world knows this.
It is know, Khaleesi.

1 to 20 of 44rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

O'dear Fabricant

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.