ChatterBank1 min ago
Voting Twice Is Wrong? Really! I'd No Idea.
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/r ochdale -counci llor-ac cepts-p olice-c aution- after-v oting-t wice-in -local- electio n-11473 294
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/u k-engla nd-manc hester- 4516854 1
As a Councillor he really should know the answer.
https:/
As a Councillor he really should know the answer.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by webbo3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes, he should have known. It's beyond me how anyone does not know the simple fact that 1 person = 1 vote. It is taught in schools - or at least it was. Anyone who has grown up here should have simply absorbed it. Don't know if this chap was born here - but if involved with politics he should have educated himself as to the basic rules.
"It is taught in schools"
Ah, but in what country? I have no idea where this cheating p o s came from but many of our new arrivals didnt got to school in the UK, in fact they come from countries where this is the norm,.
Surely this is fraud so he should be stripped of his Councillor status and send swiftly to jail.
Ah, but in what country? I have no idea where this cheating p o s came from but many of our new arrivals didnt got to school in the UK, in fact they come from countries where this is the norm,.
Surely this is fraud so he should be stripped of his Councillor status and send swiftly to jail.
We see that one man-two votes is permissible in special cases under UK law.
However, it is a general legal principle under other judicial systems. Take the case of "blood money", an alternative "punishment" agreed mutually between the perpetrator's and the victim's families in a murder trial, to the prescribed punishment under the sharia penal code, the hudood.
Cop this:
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Diya_ (Islam)
The interesting bit (under the heading "For women and non-Muslims" being:
"Diyah[blood money] is not the same for Muslim women and Muslim men in sharia courts, with Muslim woman's life and diyah compensation sentence being half as that of a Muslim man's life.[Muslims and non-Muslims are treated as unequal in the sentencing process, in cases of unintentional deaths."
Like that, do you? Diversity is our strength? Coming to a town near you - if it ain't already?
However, it is a general legal principle under other judicial systems. Take the case of "blood money", an alternative "punishment" agreed mutually between the perpetrator's and the victim's families in a murder trial, to the prescribed punishment under the sharia penal code, the hudood.
Cop this:
https:/
The interesting bit (under the heading "For women and non-Muslims" being:
"Diyah[blood money] is not the same for Muslim women and Muslim men in sharia courts, with Muslim woman's life and diyah compensation sentence being half as that of a Muslim man's life.[Muslims and non-Muslims are treated as unequal in the sentencing process, in cases of unintentional deaths."
Like that, do you? Diversity is our strength? Coming to a town near you - if it ain't already?
Very interesting but I'm not sure that has anything to do wih this case VE.
Yes, I vaguely being able to vote twice in council elections while living away at university. ( In this case of this councillor though i think there is no excuse- he should make sure he knows the rules). But I think the facility to vote twice seems wrong as it is more liekley to benefit those who can afford two homes (and perhaps those who are claiming housing benefit at two addresses I suppose). maybe time to change it to prevent any similar "misunderstandings"
Yes, I vaguely being able to vote twice in council elections while living away at university. ( In this case of this councillor though i think there is no excuse- he should make sure he knows the rules). But I think the facility to vote twice seems wrong as it is more liekley to benefit those who can afford two homes (and perhaps those who are claiming housing benefit at two addresses I suppose). maybe time to change it to prevent any similar "misunderstandings"
AOG - // /// Leader of the Labour-controlled council Allen Brett said he was "disappointed in councillor Rana's error". ///
Disappointed eh? I wonder what his response would have been if it had been a non Muslim Tory Councillor? //
I think the term 'disappointed' has a wonderful variety of meanings.
It's like 'helping the police with their enquiries' which could range from sharing a cuppa and a chat with the sergeant, to a rubber-hose / soundproof room interface.
In this instance, being 'disappointed' is the public reaction - the private one is, I have torn off the councillor's ears and served them to him in a seeded bap!
Disappointed eh? I wonder what his response would have been if it had been a non Muslim Tory Councillor? //
I think the term 'disappointed' has a wonderful variety of meanings.
It's like 'helping the police with their enquiries' which could range from sharing a cuppa and a chat with the sergeant, to a rubber-hose / soundproof room interface.
In this instance, being 'disappointed' is the public reaction - the private one is, I have torn off the councillor's ears and served them to him in a seeded bap!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.