We see that one man-two votes is permissible in special cases under UK law.
However, it is a
general legal principle under other judicial systems. Take the case of "blood money", an alternative "punishment" agreed mutually between the perpetrator's and the victim's families in a murder trial, to the prescribed punishment under the sharia penal code, the hudood.
Cop this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diya_(Islam)
The interesting bit (under the heading "For women and non-Muslims" being:
"Diyah[blood money] is not the same for Muslim women and Muslim men in sharia courts, with Muslim woman's life and diyah compensation sentence being half as that of a Muslim man's life.[Muslims and non-Muslims are treated as unequal in the sentencing process, in cases of unintentional deaths."
Like that, do you? Diversity is our strength? Coming to a town near you - if it ain't already?