The Odious Daily Mail Pursues...

[Khandro]

...the Robinsons, even on their holiday but gets outclassed by a long way. Watch the hapless biter get bitten;

[naomi24]

It's there.

[Khandro]

Your synopsis might have been reasonable without your attack of waspish, adjectival diarrhoea.
But starting with the first line, he is quite rightly and unashamedly of the what is commonly called the right, "far", I don't know what that means, perhaps you can explain this, along with the cheap comment of his "rather dubious credibility".

[Kromovaracun]

//Your synopsis might have been reasonable without your attack of waspish, adjectival diarrhoea//

I trust my audience.

[ichkeria]

You are a star kromo. I feel somewhat ashamed to have left others to plough through this ...

[Kromovaracun]

As for crediblity... well, he is a vlogger who earns money by sitting in front of a camera and making assertions without backing them up. He believes that immigrants are being deliberately imported because of a secret plan to wipe out the white race - which is, frankly, approaching levels of insanity comparable to Alex Jones or David "I'm the messiah" Icke. It's a view of the world entirely defined as the struggle between ethnic groups. It is a fantasy exclusively set out by people who believe in some sort of white-European solidarity and believe in any means necessary to "defend the white race." I think it's fairly obvious which corner of the political spectrum that comes from.

[Khandro]

Kromo; Are you aware of the Euro Arab Dialogue or EAD, if not, it's worth checking out, it's been on the European agenda since the 1970's and is still very much on the agenda of the EU.

And as for Weston, "making assertions without backing them up", you two should get along fine.

[naomi24]

This isn't about the speaker.

[Kromovaracun]

I don't make money from it, though. Or present myself as an authority on anything. I'm an anonymous guy on a website.

[naomi24]

Krom, this isn't about the speaker. Making it so is a deliberate diversion.

[Kromovaracun]

Well, Khandro did choose to present this story through Paul Weston - whose face is sitting in the embedded player right at the top of this page and takes up 5 mins of Khandro's 8 minute video. So I'll talk about the speaker all I like, thank you.

[Khandro]

Kromo; Since when has speaking one's mind been seen as presenting oneself as an authority? and come to think of it, whom do you consider to be a political "authority"?

[Kromovaracun]

I think asserting yourself as a professional political commentator (which is what PW does) innately means that you consider yourself worth listening to. I don't have much respect for people who do that and just rant in front of a camera.

[Kromovaracun]

//whom do you consider to be a political "authority"?//

I try not to get my information from 'personalities.'

News in general (and the internet/Youtube in particular) does seem to be absolutely infected with hoards of self-aggrandizing pundits at the moment. Every single one of whom claims to be a lone voice in the wilderness daring to speak truth unto power...

[bainbrig]

//whom do you consider to be a political "authority"?//

It’s that misused ‘whom’ that really gives away the paucity of the argument, being the linguistic equivalent (pace Tony Hancock) of wearing gloves and carrying one of them.

BB

[Khandro]

Brainbrig; If the answer to my question at 11:57 is "him", (which it is), then whom is correct. If the question had been say, "which person is?" the answer would be "he"(is), and therefore, "who"?

[bainbrig]

Kahndro: cobblers.

[naomi24]

Khandro at 11:54, but this is about Tommy Robinson and the Daily Mail. It isn't about Paul Weston. You're shooting the messenger in order to detract from the real issue.

[naomi24]

^Sorry, that was to Krom.

[Khandro]

n. It's standard practice for those bereft of argument.

[naomi24]

Yes, it is.