Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 60 of 90rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
Why are you defending National Action?
The same reason we defended Tommy Robinson against the braying mob on here. We don't like kangaroo courts.
I'm not keen on terrorists but I can't see a connexion with street gangs, can you?
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

/// Why are you defending National Action? ///

I am not defending NA, because I don't know what they are guilty of.

But I do know what the street gangs of London are guilty of and since we are always told to seek equality, I am trying to do just that, but for some strange reason I just cannot seem to find any in this case.
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

/// I'm not keen on terrorists but I can't see a connexion with street gangs, can you? ///

It would seem that you are keen on street gangs though.

If you read of gangs of crazed individuals going around stabbing and shooting people almost on a daily basis, you don't think it could be classed on the same basis as such a terrorist attack would be?
Here's another suggestion, Google "National Action" "proscribed group" and see what you can find out about them.
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

This thread is about the street gangs of London, not about NA.
///This thread is about the street gangs of London, not about NA. ///

You dragged them into the thread @ 12.01, AOG.

Whilst the deaths of very few people are to be applauded, the majority of these deaths are 'inter-gang' deaths, with very little danger posed to the general public.
If the Police can arrest the perpetrators during a crack-down on gang-criminality, so much the better; but I don't think it is a reason to break out the military.
ANOTHEOLDGIT, I'm well aware what the thread is about but it was you who introduced terrorism and a proscribed group.

As you don't know what terrorism is and claim not to know why NA is guilty, it seems odd to include them in your argument.

Question Author
jackthehat

/// Whilst the deaths of very few people are to be applauded, ///

What a very strange thing to say.
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

I only introduced them as a comparison, since it appears that their gang needs to be banded yet the gangs of London roam the streets freely murdering their opponents.

Instead of advising me to Google"National Action" "proscribed group" and see what I can find out about them, perhaps you would be better employed reading your newspapers so as to find out what the state of crime in London is like. Any newspaper will do they are all report on it, even the Guardian.
Question Author
jackthehat

/// If the Police can arrest the perpetrators during a crack-down on gang-criminality, so much the better; but I don't think it is a reason to break out the military. ///

Did you not notice this: 'With the help of the army if necessary', I added this because the usual suspects always put the blame down to the diminishing police numbers.
if the government wanted to, they could end gang violence, although
the human rights act would have to go, and migrants rights groups
with all legal recourse annulled, a british version of kristallnacht
it would be very messy i'm sure..but the means justifies the end.
or we carry on as it is, and hope a tragic event is not met on yourself
or your family.
ANOTHEOLDGIT you drag in terrorists and National Action in particular.

Your claim not to know why NA is proscribed is not credible since the group has been discussed in several threads in which you have been involved.

I wanted to move away from any notion that as it is 'just black people killing black people' we ought to not be overly concerned.
Question Author
jackthehat

/// I wanted to move away from any notion that as it is 'just black people killing black people' we ought to not be overly
concerned. ///

Well I think you have failed, because there seems to be quite a few who don't seem to be 'overly concerned', judging by the number of brick bats I have to endure when I show concern over the increasing number of black on black killings.
It really *is* all about you isn't it, AOG?
Question Author
THECORBYLOON

/// Your claim not to know why NA is proscribed is not credible since the group has been discussed in several threads in which you have been involved. ///

Yes and if you read some of those post, you will find that I still do not know, what horrendous crimes they have committed to warrant them being banned.

Now to get back to the multiple murder gangs in question, should they not be sorted out and banned?
Question Author
jackthehat

/// It really *is* all about you isn't it, AOG? ///

Well since I produced this thread and since I am having to answer all the things thrown at me, then I would be right in saying yes.

But perhaps if you are that much jealous, get off the fence, pick a topic and then go to the trouble of producing a thread, and then if it happens to attract attention, perhaps you may become the centre of discussion, rather than the topic under discussion.

In the meantime seek out another victim to have your fun with, because I have now better things to do with my Saturday afternoon, bye.

41 to 60 of 90rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is It Not Time That The Police Along With The Help Of The Army If Necessary, Hunted Down These Gangs And Rid Them From The Streets Of London?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.