If they don't want another swing to the right they need to address concerns, not make their nation open-house. Protesting is all very well but votes go to those who promise to solve the genuine concerns of the population as a whole, not simply carry on as before, making the hash. No one needs extremism but that's what gets support when the existing authority fails to listen.
From your link, BB
Far-right groups in the eastern city of Chemnitz clashed with police and chased people they believed to be foreign in August after the fatal stabbing of a German man that was blamed on two immigrants.
Both far right and far left have it wrong in as much as the FR is the polarised fears of the middle and the FL is the polarised liberalisation of society.
Neither end should dictate but they both try. And for the most part overall the FL wins and the FR are just noise and bluster.
If polititions truely worked for the people they would address fears without making those fearful feel less valid.
I'd like to see someone define the terms facism and far right in todays usage.
On the whole it seems to be anyone who disagrees with the so called 'liberal elite'.
As Others have said above. Swings to the far left or right are pretty much always due to the ruling parties going liberal and ignoring the masses for their own agenda.
// Heartening to see nearly a quarter of a million people protesting in Berlin over the rise of fascism in Germany //
the problem is - more than 250 000 people are voting for fascists and ultras innit ? for the same reason the brits voted for brexit
I still laugh at the idea of more freedom when brexit comes
like you know freedoms of trade barriers
and freedom to apply for visas for travel to countries we just went to before
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.