It’s Christmas Eve! What Are We...
ChatterBank9 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Perhaps because:
1) you're not comparing like with like.
2) Your statement is 'displaying discrimination or prejudice based on race' i.e. the er... dictionary definition of racist.
If a Hindu organisation depicted Christ on the cross as Kali with eight arms being nailed up, but refused to change it after your protestation, then you might have a case.
Hope that clears your confusion for you.
Thanks shaneystar. :-)
Well, I think it was possible to answer the question anyway, and Waldo did it. Having a problem with a stamp because of the use of imagery found offensive is one thing, it is QUITE another to claim to find the "presence and culture here" of all Hindus to be offensive. The Hindus in question were complaining about a stamp, which bore a picture painted by a Hindu artist. They were not asking for the removal of Christians and all things Christian from the country.
bazwillrun - do you SERIOUSLY find the "presence and culture here" of Hindu's to be offensive?
In all fairness though - it was painted by a Hindu, and is on display in a Hindu country. So clearly not ALL Hindu's found it offensive. That said, it was a pretty big judgement error for the Post Office to have made.
jake - baz wasn't asking why the stamp was offensive I think. It seems he was asking why Hindus have a right to complain when he's not allowed to say that he "finds their presence and culture here offensive".