Donate SIGN UP

Just Whose Side Is This Guy On?

Avatar Image
Jackdaw33 | 09:36 Sun 30th Dec 2018 | News
58 Answers
How disappointing. I would have thought better from him.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46713498


Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Jackdaw33. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
TTT, your immoderate tone does you no good at communicating and possibly converting people. I presume you don't want to do either of those, you just enjoy quarrelling.
TGTs posts may be bombastic and immoderate but at least he doesn't C&P large swathes of unattributed 'impartial' comment from Breitbart....

If only our glorious representatives in the HoP could simply get on with the job of implementing the will of the people instead of trying to 'feather-bed' their own futures....
I rarely read anything that’s more than about 10 lines long :-)
I don’t mind Tora: he’s entertaining at least !
Question Author
The only thing I have against TTT is his anti-smoking stance. Otherwise he's a good egg all round.
Fox is prepared to support May's agreement, so whether or not he liked the idea of Brexit in the past, he's clearly willing to sacrifice it in the present.
My first reference was by Oliver JJ Lane and the second by Victoria Friedman.
-- answer removed --
//I rarely read anything that’s more than about 10 lines long :-) //

Bless. You would be treated as "special" case here in the UK by our social services. Attention Deficit Disorder is very de rigueur at the moment. I feel that yo may not be the only candidate here on the "Bank" mind. :))
Togo, is it asking too much for you to cite the sources of your long quotes?
Apart from their names - where are they writing this stuff?
Two questions......well well.

Firstly.....when I post the links to my source, it usually elicits howls of protest because it far to precise in it's representation. You will not find any of the salient "happenings" reported on your main source media outlets. Also liable to be "moderated" out.

Secondly...… the people writing it are not in the pockets of the EUSSR and are therefore able to have freedom of thought and speech without penalty.
Old geezer he is only sacrificing it if you think the deal is not Brexit, but the deal IS Brexit of course. Probably one of a number of not very good options. All he is saying is that the alternative may be no Brexit at all (and some other nonsense about trust in parliament). He may or may not be right but it’s kind of stating the obvious really: it’s notable I suppose because of who is saying it, but then again he chose to stay on the sane wing of Brexitdom some while ago.
//The only thing I have against TTT is his anti-smoking stance. //

Just nipping out for a gasper Jack. :))
atheist, I'm not the one calling people nutjobs and right wing bully am I?
No, you just call people who disagree with you "Vichy British", which is frankly pathetic.
if you can think of a better term jim I'm all ears.
Why have you got Jihadi John as your avatar :-0)
How about "Remain supporters", TTT?
The deal IS blatantly and unarguably NOT Brexit except in name. The so called "backstop" is actually anti-Brexit.
remain supporters, jim? Would that be people who want this country controlled by a corrupt, unelected foreign power? My abbreviation still looks good.

21 to 40 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Just Whose Side Is This Guy On?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions