Crosswords1 min ago
Chris Grayling Is A Fraud
16 Answers
£14 million contract awarded to a shipping company with no money, no ships, no track record, no employees, no ports, no working website, no sailing schedule and only one telephone line.
https:/ /twitte r.com/A ndyMcDo naldMP/ status/ 1082672 2909685 84192
How can this happen with such a public eye on it?
https:/
How can this happen with such a public eye on it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by spathiphyllum. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I wish I was joking Spath….more details here
https:/ /www.st andard. co.uk/n ews/pol itics/s eaborne -freigh t-nodea l-brexi t-shipp ing-fir m-accus ed-of-c opying- tcs-fro m-food- deliver y-servi ce-a402 9791.ht ml
https:/
Presuming it's the same Company, there has been some chatter on it.
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/Cha tterBan k/Quest ion1639 312.htm l
https:/
Oh my days ludwig -.-
Only site i can find...
https:/ /seabor nefreig ht.com/
Their log in details are a photo LOL. Frauds. The lot of em.
Did not see 10ClarionSts thread.. even if i did i probably wouldn't be aware it's about the same thing lol
Only site i can find...
https:/
Their log in details are a photo LOL. Frauds. The lot of em.
Did not see 10ClarionSts thread.. even if i did i probably wouldn't be aware it's about the same thing lol
It's not unusual for transport contracts to be awarded to companies that don't actually own the the relevant type of transport. The rail company I worked for (London Eastern Railway, trading as Anglia Railways) leased all of its rolling stock and just about everything else it used in its day to day operations. Its total physical assets consisted of one van, one car and a few other assorted items, totalling only a few thousand pounds in value. Despite that it was consistently rated as the best rail operator on the UK mainland (with only the Isle of Wight's tiny Island Line coming ahead of it overall).
Many (probably most) other train operating companies don't own any trains but that doesn't prevent them from running train services. I can't see why it should be any different for ferry operators.
Many (probably most) other train operating companies don't own any trains but that doesn't prevent them from running train services. I can't see why it should be any different for ferry operators.
At the point that London Eastern Railway tendered for the contract they had a board of directors and little else. They later inherited their staff, and the basic structure of their operations, from British Rail. That, to some extent, meant that they were burdened with the remnants of what had gone before. I'm sure that they would much rather have started completely afresh if they could!
There does seem to be some ignorance on here as to how these things happen.
Even if it was a current ferry company does anyone think they would have the equipment, staff and infrastructure there ready to hand? If they did I would suggest they were not the company to pick as clearly they would be a bunch of wastrels.
Even if it was a current ferry company does anyone think they would have the equipment, staff and infrastructure there ready to hand? If they did I would suggest they were not the company to pick as clearly they would be a bunch of wastrels.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.