Question Author
I was going to start a new thread but i feel that may rustle feathers as i've made a few MJ threads and McCann threads so i'll put it here..
People say the evidence against MJ even though there is no proof is so strong that it's undeniable he committed child abuse.
People say, even though there is solid evidence such as a helicopter blowing smoke in the direction of TV cameras, not to mention the insurance policy change.. that 911 was terrorism and wasn't an inside job not to mention the other crashes such as the one at the pentagon...
And when it comes to Madeleine McCann, most people refuse to believe the parents were involved even though there is a lot of evidence that suggests otherwise such as a sniffer dog marking the scent of a corpse coming from the vehicle they hired a month after the disappearance, not to mention, once they became a potential suspect (why wouldn't they be?) Ms McCanns refusal to comply with the police by not answering vital questions.
I think the evidence is there to suggest they were a part of it, but why are people so eager to dismiss this?