ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Hasn't This Rapist Hasn't Yet Been Sent Back To Somalia?
51 Answers
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-6 818057/ Rapist- 30-depo rtation -flight -stoppe d-passe nger-mu tiny-UK .html
I hope that those ridiculous plane passenger mutineers are pleased with themselves.
I hope that those ridiculous plane passenger mutineers are pleased with themselves.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.You’ve moved the goalposts, AOG. Your original question was why hasn’t he been sent back to Somalia, to whit Mamya gave you an answer, in the spirit of Answerbank, which may lead to you finding out.
Now you’re asking a different question, to whit; whether we’re happy that rapists are free to walk around. Did you mean to ask this originally?
Now you’re asking a different question, to whit; whether we’re happy that rapists are free to walk around. Did you mean to ask this originally?
https:/ /www.ca a.co.uk /Passen gers/On -board/ Disrupt ive-pas sengers /
Not the best link but CAA law does state that passengers who disrupt a flight or cause it to be diverted can be charged with the cost of the diversion or delay.There is a max 5 years imprisonment for 'passenger disturbance' on an aircraft but does not specify exactly what. Endangering a flight by attempting to open the emergency door springs to mind.
Not the best link but CAA law does state that passengers who disrupt a flight or cause it to be diverted can be charged with the cost of the diversion or delay.There is a max 5 years imprisonment for 'passenger disturbance' on an aircraft but does not specify exactly what. Endangering a flight by attempting to open the emergency door springs to mind.
I suspect he hasn’t gone yet because he might be appealing the deportation order.
As the Daily Mail reported, ‘errors in law’ were made at his original appeal
// At another hearing before the Upper Tribunal in October 2016 – costing at least another £1,000 – judge Clive Lane ruled there had been an ‘error in law’ in the earlier hearing and ordered another case before the First-Tier Tribunal, which was due to be heard last December.
Yet before the hearing took place, Ahmed’s lawyers withdrew the case, for reasons unknown.
Ahmed was therefore put on a Turkish Airlines flight to Istanbul on October 9. //
Could be they have resubmitted.
As the Daily Mail reported, ‘errors in law’ were made at his original appeal
// At another hearing before the Upper Tribunal in October 2016 – costing at least another £1,000 – judge Clive Lane ruled there had been an ‘error in law’ in the earlier hearing and ordered another case before the First-Tier Tribunal, which was due to be heard last December.
Yet before the hearing took place, Ahmed’s lawyers withdrew the case, for reasons unknown.
Ahmed was therefore put on a Turkish Airlines flight to Istanbul on October 9. //
Could be they have resubmitted.
Whatever the ins and outs of this particular case, clearly there's a problem with deporting people on commercial flights that include holidaymakers and business people, which is this: the criminal can kick up and make so much fuss that the paying passengers don't want to be seated near them, in which case the recourse of the airline is to throw the offending passenger off the plane, which is exactly what they want.
I know if I'd been a passenger on that flight I would have wanted the criminal off the plane, and not because I felt sorry for him or thought that justice wasn't being done.
I know if I'd been a passenger on that flight I would have wanted the criminal off the plane, and not because I felt sorry for him or thought that justice wasn't being done.
//Endangering a flight by attempting to open the emergency door springs to mind. //
the legislation is here - but in typical legislation, it's incredibly woolly.
http:// www.leg islatio n.gov.u k/uksi/ 2016/76 5/part/ 10/made /data.x ht?wrap =true
but just as a point of pedantry, opening any doors in flight is impossible. they're plug doors and are held shut by the pressure differential inside/outside the aircraft.
the legislation is here - but in typical legislation, it's incredibly woolly.
http://
but just as a point of pedantry, opening any doors in flight is impossible. they're plug doors and are held shut by the pressure differential inside/outside the aircraft.
Sqad writes:
// I may be wrong, but looking at the video it appears that all the "troublemakers " are holidaymakers,i.e Brits and the other passengers, who are letting the Home office officials do their job, seem to be foreigners, maybe Turkish. //
AOG writes:
// I thought it was strange, that British holiday makers would be involved. But if you had bothered to view the video they definitely weren't white British holiday makers. //
// I may be wrong, but looking at the video it appears that all the "troublemakers " are holidaymakers,i.e Brits and the other passengers, who are letting the Home office officials do their job, seem to be foreigners, maybe Turkish. //
AOG writes:
// I thought it was strange, that British holiday makers would be involved. But if you had bothered to view the video they definitely weren't white British holiday makers. //
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.