Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Gorgeous George In The Bin Again.....
19 Answers
https:/
Should this MAABOF loony be on the air?
Should this MAABOF loony be on the air?
Answers
1 to 19 of 19
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
eh.. ofcom pic and choose. Is George really that influential?
http://
http://
When Mr Galloway cites reasons for the 'attacks' on Jeremy Corbyn as being Mr Corbyn's 'astounding success', you know that he is either having a laugh at his listeners' expense, or he is seriously deluded as to the reference of the term 'success'.
Either of those point to someone who is continually given a platform for his views which are as pointless as they are outrageous, and maximises those opportunities at every turn.
Mr Galloway demonstrated his inability to ignore the chance to show off relentlessly when he appeared on Big Brother - I think in the further reaches of his mind, he is actually still there.
Either of those point to someone who is continually given a platform for his views which are as pointless as they are outrageous, and maximises those opportunities at every turn.
Mr Galloway demonstrated his inability to ignore the chance to show off relentlessly when he appeared on Big Brother - I think in the further reaches of his mind, he is actually still there.
Another man with a lot of gifts sadly gone to waste.
Tragically someone like him is always going to appeal to trash radio stations.
He’s on RT as well “orbiting my ego” sorry that should be “orbiting the world”
Having him actually present stuff rather than be interviewed occasionally as “nob in a black hat” really is the definition of letting loonies run the asylum.
Tragically someone like him is always going to appeal to trash radio stations.
He’s on RT as well “orbiting my ego” sorry that should be “orbiting the world”
Having him actually present stuff rather than be interviewed occasionally as “nob in a black hat” really is the definition of letting loonies run the asylum.
LBC specialises in the shock jock genre.
Its presenters are largely employed for their ability to generate headlines for themselves, and the station. They do not pretend to be fair, impatial or non partisan. They hold strong opinions and use the airwaves to push their agenda.
The charges against Galloway would surely apply to other LBC employees such as Nigel Farage, Nick Ferrari,
Jacob Rees-Mogg and Maajid Nawaz.
Its presenters are largely employed for their ability to generate headlines for themselves, and the station. They do not pretend to be fair, impatial or non partisan. They hold strong opinions and use the airwaves to push their agenda.
The charges against Galloway would surely apply to other LBC employees such as Nigel Farage, Nick Ferrari,
Jacob Rees-Mogg and Maajid Nawaz.
Don't like him and certainly don't agree with his politics, but I'll listen to what he has to say if he crops up on something I'm watching or listening to, because he's a brilliant debater - as those on the US Senate Committee found out in 2005.
Same goes for Alex Salmond - gives me the creeps, but a fearsome combatant in debates.
Same goes for Alex Salmond - gives me the creeps, but a fearsome combatant in debates.
// The charges against Galloway would surely apply to other LBC employees such as Nigel Farage, Nick Ferrari,
Jacob Rees-Mogg and Maajid Nawaz. //
The best way to do these shows would be to have two equal but opposite loonies co-hosting, basically arguing the for and against on each issue, and calling each other out there and then when they spout nonsense.
I think that would be entertaining and get round the need to be impartial, because you've got balance. That's not what these shows are about though. They prefer one loony at a time spouting nonsense unchallenged, thus generating more controversy.
Jacob Rees-Mogg and Maajid Nawaz. //
The best way to do these shows would be to have two equal but opposite loonies co-hosting, basically arguing the for and against on each issue, and calling each other out there and then when they spout nonsense.
I think that would be entertaining and get round the need to be impartial, because you've got balance. That's not what these shows are about though. They prefer one loony at a time spouting nonsense unchallenged, thus generating more controversy.
// Should this MAABOF be foo ? //
yarp - - or nope - but this will convulse AB for the next three days at least !
Married to an Arab - this fella gives short shrift to the Israelis and is criticised for it - well yeah, free speech an all dat !
It is not as tho people go out and think - oh I must do what Gorgeous George says !
yarp - - or nope - but this will convulse AB for the next three days at least !
Married to an Arab - this fella gives short shrift to the Israelis and is criticised for it - well yeah, free speech an all dat !
It is not as tho people go out and think - oh I must do what Gorgeous George says !
1 to 19 of 19
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
ChatterBank3 mins ago
So Lets Shaft Our Farmers.....
News9 mins ago
Film, Media & TV13 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.