News2 mins ago
What Do Our Ardent Brextremists Think Of This U-Turn By One Of Their Erstwhile Supporters ?
There are some interesting Tweets and other opinions throughout the article.
https:/ /uk.yah oo.com/ news/le ading-b rexitee r-peter -oborne -calls- 2139403 00.html
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Mr Oborne writes for the Daily Mail. For some inexplicable reason the Mail, since Christmas, has been imploring its readers to support Mrs May's appalling (non) Brexit agreement. It seems a reasonable step, bearing in mind that agreement is as dead now as it was when it was first presented to Parliament, to move on and suggest either a long postponement or abandonment altogether (the two likely to ultimately amount to one and the same).
Mr Oborne suggests that the "economic arguments have been destroyed". Whether or not that is so I neither know nor care because the economic arguments were never a consideration for me.
Mr Oborne suggests that the "economic arguments have been destroyed". Whether or not that is so I neither know nor care because the economic arguments were never a consideration for me.
I suppose it depends very much whether you believe we would become the "sovereign poor" as opposed to the "supplicant rich". Personally I don't believe that we would. The way things are going it may well be that many of the EU27 turn out to be the poorer, but it's an argument that never entered my head when I cast my vote. If you want to sell the nation's soul for ten pieces of silver that's your privilege. But those views did not prevail in the referendum.
//For some inexplicable reason the Mail, since Christmas, has been imploring its readers to support Mrs May's appalling (non) Brexit agreement//
Yes,having had some sympathy for the 'Spartans' the emphasis then turned sharply on them giving up before it was too late and to support Mrs May's deal because her deal was better than the other alternatives.
Yes,having had some sympathy for the 'Spartans' the emphasis then turned sharply on them giving up before it was too late and to support Mrs May's deal because her deal was better than the other alternatives.
//If you want to sell the nation's soul for ten pieces of silver//
I'm embarrassed by having to correct one of AB's Brexit champions for two pieces of uncharacteristic sloppiness.
Firstly the sum alluded to was thirty, not ten, but now is more like forty and denomiated in Euros not si.
Secondly, in the surreal world of May's government it's Judas who's pays, not the Sadducees.
I'm embarrassed by having to correct one of AB's Brexit champions for two pieces of uncharacteristic sloppiness.
Firstly the sum alluded to was thirty, not ten, but now is more like forty and denomiated in Euros not si.
Secondly, in the surreal world of May's government it's Judas who's pays, not the Sadducees.
It's clear that the editorial line of the Daily Mail on Brexit has shifted of late, but I still think it's possible for Peter Oborne to be speaking for himself. And in any case, even if Leave-voting supporters of, either, a Withdrawal Agreement, or some sort of pause in the process to consider the matter and the approach more carefully, are in the minority, they do still exist. Brexit "puritanism" seems to be taking over the debate, on AnswerBank especially.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.