How it Works1 min ago
Is Brexit To Blame For Ch4 News' Poor Ratings?
...or could there be other factors involved?
https:/ /order- order.c om/2019 /06/11/ channel -4-news -blame- brexit- sliding -viewin g-figur es/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The Channel 4 News was to the fore in uncovering the Tory expenses scandal which allegedly helped keep Farage out of enemy territory on Westminster. It’s a bit different from other news programmes deliberately so. They often focus on one story, which is less good if that story is of less interest.
Their report doesn’t “blame Brexit” : it lists several factors one of which is that people are watching less news because they are fed up of the Brexit saga. I cannot imagine why :-)
So your question is answered by your own link.
Their report doesn’t “blame Brexit” : it lists several factors one of which is that people are watching less news because they are fed up of the Brexit saga. I cannot imagine why :-)
So your question is answered by your own link.
People didn't pay attention to channel 4 anyhow. channel 4 dispatches i feel are amazing. They unearthed to much tory scandles, i'm not surprised the viewing figures are down. Right wingers don't like that kind of reality, leaving only the left as an audience. Then half of the left aren't mature enough to commit themselves to a channel 4 documentary.. So you get like 1/4 of the pop left...
ichi //even your freaky website quotes faithfully. He’s just stuck a misleading headline on the top to please what is no doubt his target audience. //
Guido isn't "freaky", It is, I have on good authority, the site read by most politicians, and the headline isn't in any way "misleading", it's direct from Ch4 itself, who say it's because of, “a number of factors including change in TV viewing habits, " - Brilliant!! the change of viewing habits being that people don't want to watch their "freaky" product.
Anyway, you keep watching and it's now clear from where you gather your information.
Guido isn't "freaky", It is, I have on good authority, the site read by most politicians, and the headline isn't in any way "misleading", it's direct from Ch4 itself, who say it's because of, “a number of factors including change in TV viewing habits, " - Brilliant!! the change of viewing habits being that people don't want to watch their "freaky" product.
Anyway, you keep watching and it's now clear from where you gather your information.
Ch4 tries to be niche, that comes with inherent problems particularly since you automatically exclude swathes of the population from the outset. It doesnt take much more to reduce your audience by some 'biased reporting' that pees of your target audience as well.
I think that was was Spath was sort of alluding to.
I think that was was Spath was sort of alluding to.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.