Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
24 Hour Boozing....
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by Loosehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.For the life of me, I can't understand where the notion that extended drinking hours will turn UK society into a 'cafe society' as in Europe.
The French, Spanish, et al grow up with wine as part of a meal. There is no mystery involved, they enjoy a glass or wine or beer with a meal, and sit at cafes late into the night, sipping and talking, always have, always will.
Contrast that with the UK drinkers who crash into alcohol at the earliest copportunity, and regard anything less than moderate alcohol poisoning as a failure to enjoy themsevles.
European drinkers drink to enjoy a drink, British drinkers drink to get drunk - it's as simple as that, and no amount of waffling is going to alter that basic fundamental cultural difference between us.
It's interesting to note that when the government wanted to extend the detainment time for terrorist suspects, the word of the police was uppermost in their media soundbites, but when the police, doctors, lawyers, and general populace expressed dismay at their rampant determination to force through extended drinking hours, the government proved strangly deaf!
So Looshead - thins will get worse, because we drink for the loss of inhibition that passes for a good time in our uptight restrictive culture, and drunkeness will continue and escalate as the most serious socail malaise of our society in the twenty-first century.
I'm 100% with Gef.
re drinking, there are basically three types:
- Those who never or only rarely drink
- Those who like to go out and get tipsy or even drunk, but behave themselves and know when to stop
- Those who go out, get wasted, and cause a problem.
Any change in the drinking laws will not change this at all.
If the government wants people to take the binge drinking problem seriously they need to get rid of this RIDICULOUS notion that anything over 4 pints makes you a binge drinker. Drinking per se is not the problem - it's drunk and disorderly behaviour. They're going about it totally the wrong way and it's not going to get solved the way they are doing it.
BUT - it's not, imho, hypocritical. What the message they sending out says to me is this - if publicans want to stay open longer, they can do, and if you want to stay out later and drink more slowly that's great, but if you throw up or start a fight etc, we'll slap an �80 fine on you... it's ok to drink, but do so responsibly.
Most of the 24 hour licences will go to supermarkets anyway - where people buy alcohol to drink at home. Now, perhaps I'm being thick, but I am pretty convinced that there is no law to stop us drinking the alcohol we buy in the supermarkets at any hour of the day. Therefore quite how this change would turn us all into alcoholics via the supermarket, I don't know.
It's not the drink that gets my bloody pressure, it's talking about it! LOL
To suggest that ��all UK drinkers crash into alcohol �� is indeed a ridiculous generalisation, which is why I didn�t say it!
What I said was �Contrast that with the UK drinkers �� which has an entirely different meaning than the one you attempt to credit me with.
The thrust of my argument is about cultural differences. Europeans enjoy alcohol from an early age, unlike a lot of British teenagers, for whom alcohol is both a mysterious rite of passage into a perceived adult behaviour, and for whom excess drinking is the only genuine measure of a good time socialising.
The notion that extending drinking hours will turn people who drink as much as quickly as possible into steady pavement caf� customers putting the world to rights is simply farcical. In most pubs, it is possible to buy alcohol from lunchtime until the early hours � a potential twelve-hour session is perfectly feasible. So why do a large number of people crowd into the pubs around ten p.m., drink themselves insensible for four hours, and then spill into the streets to throw up and fight.
Alcohol �enjoyment� in the UK is based on rapid excess drinking, and the extension of hours will not suddenly make moderate slow sippers and pavement sages out of these individuals � our attitude to alcohol is firmly rooted in the notion of drinking to get drunk, and that is where we differ from Europe, and indeed, the rest of the world.
We do not have continental attitudes to alcohol, or various other aspects of life � extending pub opening hours against all the medical and legal advice available, is not going to suddenly put these behaviours in place.
Andy - that's STILL a sweeping generalisation. You're still making assumptions about ALL British teenagers. Not EVERYONE'S parents make alcohol the forbidden fruit. In fact - it's the government who is doing that right now. Their message that 4 pints = binge drinking and that alcohol = evil is probably going to draw more teenagers in than put them off.
What we need is more parents who allow their kids to drink from the age of 16 (or maybe even lower if the children/parents are mature enough - it's all on individual circumstances of course), but only one small glass of wine or spritzer, or one half of lager with a meal on special occasions. Break them in from there, and there will be less of a problem.
You do appear to be implying that ALL British teenagers have the same attitude towards drink, and in that respect, I feel that SAM is perfectly entitled to point out that this is a generalisation.
Hi january_bug, I agree, I am speaking in general terms - because the question, and the concept surrounding it are general.
I have not stated, nor inferred, that all teenagers drink to excess, I have simply made the point that, as a society, we enjoy alcohol differently than Europeans, and the notion that erxtending hours to bring us in line with continental alcohol outlets will somehow ensure a quantum leap from rapid / excesive consumption to measured and reduced consumption is a nonsense.
Yes, it is a general point - but so is the question raised by Loosehead - do tyou think it will make thigs worse or better? Worse, for the reaons i have outlined at length.
Alcohol abuse is a serious social problem in this country, that is a simple fact. The idea that giving people more time to drink reduces the impetus to drink quickly and to excess is based on nothing more than fanciful idealism, and not reflected in the evidence given at length by doctors, police, judges, and the wishes and opinions of the majority of the population.
As Loosehead observes, the British are predisposed to get drunk and cause problems. I do not for one moment suggest that this is everyone, simply that it is a worringly large, and increasing number, and this change in the law will do nothing at all to prevent the increase and spread of this situation.
As someone who is in buggy's drinking catagory 1. but used to be in category 3. in my opinion I feel that although opening longer hours may not reduce the overall drinking problems it will lead to police being able to manage the problems of closing time better.
When I was younger I would not dare go near the local taxi rank due to the violence that occured there every friday and saturday night between 2-3am, the Q was always a mile long which aggrivated the problems. Likewise the streets outside the major clubs were heaving and there was always trouble. Surely if people are leaving clubs over a sustained period of say 2 to 3or even 4 hours this will reduce the peak periods of congestion and hence the masses and large Q's at trouble areas so the police and emergency services would be able to spread their resources likewise instead of dealing with a mad panic happy hour.
I agree with the notion but during my late teens and early twenties (not that long ago) we would all get as much down our necks simply because we knew at 11:00 we would be kicked out of the pub in London
Contrast that with the situation when I moved to Ashford in Kent where the pubs closed at 1:00 there was never the rush because we knew we had all night.
When I was in London (all be it in the suburbs) there was always trouble, plenty of fights from the hours of 11:00 - 12:00 because all of a sudden there were literally 100's of people pushed on to the streets.
In Ashford there were still the same number of people but they gradually left the pub from 12:00 there were never packs of people on the street at once and I can honestly say I never once witnessed any problems.
Do I think it will turn us all into cafe style drinkers... No, but will it help the situation even in some small way... definately. I fail to see how it can be a bad thing to give people the choice when they finish drinking.
For me the issue isn't will people get more or less drunk, it's that people will no longer be forced onto the street at the same time.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.