Quizzes & Puzzles53 mins ago
Should A By-Election Be Called, If A Traitor To Their Party And To Those Those Who Voted Them In Power, Joins Another Party?
60 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes they should, I take OG's point but usually the candidate is selected by the party hierarchy(nodded through by the local committee) so the constituents have not had a say in the candidate, really they voted for the party so yes if that MP then joins another party I'd say it should trigger a bye election and they can stand for their new party.
Old_Geezer
Do you vote for them if they happen to have a pretty face then?
People vote for candidates who happen to represent the political party of their choice.
If this type of thing is allowed to continue what is stopping a candidate standing for election under the disguise of a local popular party and then once in power moving over to their chosen party?
Do you vote for them if they happen to have a pretty face then?
People vote for candidates who happen to represent the political party of their choice.
If this type of thing is allowed to continue what is stopping a candidate standing for election under the disguise of a local popular party and then once in power moving over to their chosen party?
Yes. Unless they stand as an independent, they stand as a representative of a particular party with the implied promise they'll support the manifesto of that party.
If they subsequently decide they can no longer do that, that's fair enough, but it should trigger a by-election so that the electorate can decide if they still want that individual to represent them.
If they subsequently decide they can no longer do that, that's fair enough, but it should trigger a by-election so that the electorate can decide if they still want that individual to represent them.
I’ve always thought they should. It doesn’t matter which party they belonged to either.
When you win a seat under the banner of a specific organisation and their manifesto then you should stick to it. If you disagree with the manifesto then you shouldn’t be a member of that party.
Would these people have won their seats from a cold start of not having the party backing and party money? Would people have voted for them as independent or another party?
Only the electorate can say.
When you win a seat under the banner of a specific organisation and their manifesto then you should stick to it. If you disagree with the manifesto then you shouldn’t be a member of that party.
Would these people have won their seats from a cold start of not having the party backing and party money? Would people have voted for them as independent or another party?
Only the electorate can say.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.