Quizzes & Puzzles52 mins ago
Jihadi Jack: 'free Me So I Can Fight Against Islamic Radicalisation'
//Jack Letts tells Sky News he doesn't mind losing his British citizenship because he doesn't want to be governed by Boris Johnson.//
Well, he’s cracked that one – but he wants to fight against Islamic radicalisation? Does anyone believe him?
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/j ihadi-j ack-fre e-me-so -i-can- fight-a gainst- islamic -radica lisatio n-11789 744
Well, he’s cracked that one – but he wants to fight against Islamic radicalisation? Does anyone believe him?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I see no particular reason to disbelieve the honesty of his statement(s) but obviously trusting him is something that requires some caution. He was basically still a child when he set off on his fanciful and ill-fated path. By now a lot of reality will have made a dent/impression in/on his fervour/mind. If I imagine myself as a (passionate, easily influenced, etc.) romantic ideologue at that age, say some sort of nationalist, then I cannot swear that I might not go further than I should in trying to bring about my type of utopia ("democracy", "freedom", "control", etc., etc.). Right through history there are countless examples of misguided youths of all sorts, IS recruits are the latest and most modern manifestation of such folly (at the other end of the folly spectrum there are those who confine themselves to ranting on an internet forum in their old age).
It should be relatively easy to examine his willingness/intentions when it comes to speaking out against Muslim extremism. From what he is reported to have said it strikes me this man is very possibly at least of average intelligence, not a vacant head - which is likely exactly why he is in his present predicament. This business with revoking of nationality is of course, like so much else from that direction, simply for convenience on the political stage, there is no deep thinking behind it.
It should be relatively easy to examine his willingness/intentions when it comes to speaking out against Muslim extremism. From what he is reported to have said it strikes me this man is very possibly at least of average intelligence, not a vacant head - which is likely exactly why he is in his present predicament. This business with revoking of nationality is of course, like so much else from that direction, simply for convenience on the political stage, there is no deep thinking behind it.
I am not a particularly liberal minded person, but to me this young man is on the Autism spectrum and is not entirely responsible for his actions. I think he should have been allowed back to the UK and monitored closely. I actually feel sorry for him and his parents.
Do not feel the same way about Jihadi brides. Feel they are a much more dangerous proposition.
Do not feel the same way about Jihadi brides. Feel they are a much more dangerous proposition.
It seems that the father is doing some plotting for his terrorist son. Here is an article from a Canadian newspaper: https:/ /www.th eglobea ndmail. com/pol itics/a rticle- jack-le ttss-fa ther-ho pes-can ada-wil l-step- up-to-t he-plat e-to-se cure/
//I actually feel sorry for him and his parents.
Do not feel the same way about Jihadi brides. Feel they are a much more dangerous proposition.//
I'll be completely honest Margeret, I'm the complete opposite. The brides were children who were groomed and brainwashed online. I don't think they pose any real danger, and should be returned and tried of any crimes here.
Do not feel the same way about Jihadi brides. Feel they are a much more dangerous proposition.//
I'll be completely honest Margeret, I'm the complete opposite. The brides were children who were groomed and brainwashed online. I don't think they pose any real danger, and should be returned and tried of any crimes here.
By allowing him to survive they are funding terrorism. If no funding then he (they) would have to stop.
So yes, however you spin it they funded terrorism and they were found guilty. They were told not to do it so they knew full well what they were doing. Selfih nasty people who didnt care about how their 'lovely' son's actions maybe killing other innocents.
So yes, however you spin it they funded terrorism and they were found guilty. They were told not to do it so they knew full well what they were doing. Selfih nasty people who didnt care about how their 'lovely' son's actions maybe killing other innocents.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.