Crosswords2 mins ago
It Seems It's A Legal Eagle That Got It Wrong.....
28 Answers
https:/ /news.s ky.com/ story/e xclusiv e-pm-wa s-advis ed-by-a ttorney -genera l-suspe nsion-w as-lawf ul-1181 8599
Any PM has to rely on advice from experts, it seems on this occasion that advice was wrong. Will Geoff Cox get the old tin tac?
Any PM has to rely on advice from experts, it seems on this occasion that advice was wrong. Will Geoff Cox get the old tin tac?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Former Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption on the R4 Today program today made interesting listening. He said that if he was in Geoffrey Cox's position he would have given the same advice as Cox did. He also said that the Supreme Court were justified in what they did, by the extreme behaviour of the government who "sought to undermine the democratic legitimacy of public decision making".
You can hear the full interview here, starting at 1:15:36
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /sounds /play/m 0008nwz
You can hear the full interview here, starting at 1:15:36
https:/
""sought to undermine the democratic legitimacy of public decision making""
ah, i see , like the saboteurs and traitors to undermine the democratic legitimacy of public voting, a vote which said leave the eussr, but they are doing ther damnest to overturn with co-ordinated efforts any possible way they can...that sort of democratic undermining is ok though is it ?
ah, i see , like the saboteurs and traitors to undermine the democratic legitimacy of public voting, a vote which said leave the eussr, but they are doing ther damnest to overturn with co-ordinated efforts any possible way they can...that sort of democratic undermining is ok though is it ?
Khandro
The Supreme Court did not change the rules.
The Attorney General’s advice may have been in good faith but it was wrong.
A (different) Attorney General ruled in 2003 that the War with Iraq was legal. That too was dubious, but no one challenged it in Court. Chilcott said the ruling was unsatisfactory.
The Supreme Court did not change the rules.
The Attorney General’s advice may have been in good faith but it was wrong.
A (different) Attorney General ruled in 2003 that the War with Iraq was legal. That too was dubious, but no one challenged it in Court. Chilcott said the ruling was unsatisfactory.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.