On A Scale Of 1 To 10, With 10 Being The Worst, How Dangerous Is Mcdonnell?

[Deskdiary]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7714229/Labour-reveals-Winter-Discontent-strike-plan-paralyse-Britain.html

Labour supporters, please please explain me why you feel this dangerous man would be good for the country.

There was a poster on this site a few months ago, a rabid frothing at the mouth Socialist, who refused to acknowledge the Winter of Discontent and the mountain of rubbish in Leicester Square, even when presented with the evidence, so I wonder whether there's some weird political blindness some people have when presented with the likes of McDonnell.

[Old_Geezer]

About 1.

One usually has to form a majority government to get dangerous stuff passed.

[Old_Geezer]

I think posters were saying there was no local evidence of it. But as it was on the news some areas had problems.

[naomi24]

Best not give him the chance to show us.

[THELOONYCORBYN]

if god forbid him and his sort ever get power then we are looking at 15 !

[Jackdaw33]

I am reminded of a novel by Sue Townsend (of Adrian Mole fame) called The Queen and I. It centres aroung the 1992 election, The Queen is watching the results when she dozes off. A new republican socialist government is elected and the entire royal family are evicted from BP and forced to live on a council estate. How they cope with everyday life is hilarious. The story ends when the Queen wakes up the next morning with the telly still on and sees that the Tories have won.

[Peter Pedant]

he has two heads,
and a forked tail
and so obviously should be shot on sight

am I allowed to say that about a politician
one of the Great and Good ?

[Peter Pedant]

there is quite a good Ben Belton book on the same subject -
oh hold it - it may be X factor

anyway Prince Charles wins, as he presciently knows he will as otherwise there is no point in selecting him

[Canary42]

How desperate the Tory Toffs are getting going back into history - what next, the Ground Nuts Scheme ?

But you don't need to go back at all, but just stick to the present to see increasing NHS queues, increasing soup kitchens, increasing food banks, increasing poverty, rich getting fatter and fatter, public services in decline, homelessness on the rise, shops closing by the thousands and so on.

I wonder whether there's some political blindness some people have when presented with the likes of Johnson and Cummings.

[ummmm]

And an increasing population!

[emmie]

none so blind that cannot see. he is dangerous and i wonder that many will vote Labour in

[Gromit]

I was hesitant to click the Mail link because I didn’t want to waste my own time.
But I clicked it, and duly, it was a waste of time.

Mcdonnell Is not at all dangerous. While I disagree with a lot of Labour Party Policy, particularly renationalising the Railways, there are one or two policies that I could support.

[ToraToraTora]

Mad Dog McDonnell? 11 if he ever gets anywhere near no 10, -1 if he just sticks to anti semitism and pro terrorism.

[drmorgans]

Does anyone seriously think that Labour will be the biggest party after the election, let alone have a majority, even in coalition with the SNP and Plaid?

[Zacs-Master]

I think there are a few rocking backwards and forwards in padded cells, dribbling and claiming to be Napoleon’s horse.

[ToraToraTora]

it's ok zacs, neither side have said they'd raise the tax on jelly and nails!:)

[dannyk13]

10 very dangerous

[Zacs-Master]

But do we believe them, Tora?

[CrapAtCryptics]

I dont think hes dangerous just a richardhead

[davebro]

I was scared of McD's plans UNTIL Labour published it's manifesto. What they are proposing is so ludicrously fanciful that they could never implement it even if they won the GE with a huge majority. They have totally lost the plot. I'll give him 1 since zero not available.

[youngmafbog]

McDonnell is very dangerous, but it's not just him is it?

And some of these labour voters just dont seem to understand basic mathematics i.e. 90% of zero is zero, as happened last time.