Quizzes & Puzzles16 mins ago
Ethical Veganism Could Become A Protected Characteristic Under The Equality Act.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ lifeand style/2 020/jan /03/eth ical-ve ganism- is-a-be lief-pr otected -by-law -tribun al-rule s
Could this decision pave the way for ethical veganism to become a protected characteristic under the Equality Act?
If this comes to pass, am I the only one to think it is nuts?
Surely it is a false equivalency to suggest a belief, which is arrived at personally, should have the same protection under the Act as race or sexuality or disability which nobody has a choice over.
Could this decision pave the way for ethical veganism to become a protected characteristic under the Equality Act?
If this comes to pass, am I the only one to think it is nuts?
Surely it is a false equivalency to suggest a belief, which is arrived at personally, should have the same protection under the Act as race or sexuality or disability which nobody has a choice over.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Vegan sacked by the League Against Cruel Sports and promptly accuses them of violating his quasi religious beliefs. Haha I approve 100% when the luvvies eat each other, but do wish that they would leave the rest out of their car crash animal, vegetable, miserable lives.
The whole contrived clown circus of manoeuvres has become a series of jokes that write themselves. Pass the sick bag vicar.
The whole contrived clown circus of manoeuvres has become a series of jokes that write themselves. Pass the sick bag vicar.
"No conflict of interest there then; get the non-disclosure agreements ready."
You're seeing a conflict where there isn't one.
It's the League Against Cruel Sports, not the 'League Against Pension Money Being Invested In Companies That May Test Products On Animals That May Ultimately Lead To The Improvement Of Our Lives.'
You're seeing a conflict where there isn't one.
It's the League Against Cruel Sports, not the 'League Against Pension Money Being Invested In Companies That May Test Products On Animals That May Ultimately Lead To The Improvement Of Our Lives.'
Alas it is clearly you that doesn't 'get it'.
There is a yawning chasm of a difference between cruel sports involving animals that may be undertaken to sate those watching, to animal testing that is undertaken ultimately to improve our lives.
You also don't know how pensions work - I know exactly where my pension money is invested, it is freely available information.
There is a yawning chasm of a difference between cruel sports involving animals that may be undertaken to sate those watching, to animal testing that is undertaken ultimately to improve our lives.
You also don't know how pensions work - I know exactly where my pension money is invested, it is freely available information.
Deskdiary, you don't know who those companies being invested in are nor what form of testing they are doing'
You know exactly where your pension money is invested, and that information is freely available to you, well good, that is how it should be but that is not the case here or Mr Casamitjana is unlikely to need to inform his colleagues about their pension details.
You know exactly where your pension money is invested, and that information is freely available to you, well good, that is how it should be but that is not the case here or Mr Casamitjana is unlikely to need to inform his colleagues about their pension details.
Whether he wins his tribunal or not, and we probably dont have enough information to pass judgement on that, he has indeed paved the way for ethical veganism to be a protected characteristic. Hoorah! Whats the harm in it? One less section of society to be bullied at work for having made an ethical choice about something.
Maydup - you haven't considered the possible consequences if ethical veganism is made a protected characteristic.
Christmas party banned because people are served Turkey in the presence of an ethical vegan who objects and therefore finds it passive discrimination.
Spurious allegations of a failure to promote or interview because of perceived discrimination by an ethical vegan.
Claims against restaurants for discrimination for failing to provide a vegan option.
If I could be bothered I could easily provide other examples.
Christmas party banned because people are served Turkey in the presence of an ethical vegan who objects and therefore finds it passive discrimination.
Spurious allegations of a failure to promote or interview because of perceived discrimination by an ethical vegan.
Claims against restaurants for discrimination for failing to provide a vegan option.
If I could be bothered I could easily provide other examples.
LOL - Maydup - you haven't considered the possible consequences if ethical veganism is made a protected characteristic. Etc
Of course I have!
Protected characteristics are relevent to employment law, not everyday life. A restaurant wont be legally obliged to offer a vegan option tomorrow any more than it did yesterday, but it will be considered good practise for a works canteen to.
Indeed employees will be protected against failure to promote because they repeatedly upset the apple cart by not eating the turkey dinner at Christmas party!
Of course I have!
Protected characteristics are relevent to employment law, not everyday life. A restaurant wont be legally obliged to offer a vegan option tomorrow any more than it did yesterday, but it will be considered good practise for a works canteen to.
Indeed employees will be protected against failure to promote because they repeatedly upset the apple cart by not eating the turkey dinner at Christmas party!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.