Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Weinstein Looks
Weinstein looks like the guilt of being a sexual abuser is getting to him.
https:/ /www.in depende nt.co.u k/news/ world/a mericas /harvey -weinst ein-new s-today -court- trial-w alker-s exual-a ssault- victims -new-yo rk-a927 2326.ht ml
https:/
Answers
// Ernest Walter Saunders (born 21 October 1935) is a British former business manager, best known as one of the "Guinness Four", a group of businessmen who attempted fraudulently to manipulate the share price of the Guinness company. He was sentenced to five years' imprisonment , but released after 10 months as he was believed to be suffering from...
16:06 Mon 06th Jan 2020
//Why would you be sacked by the board of your own company for "Information about misconduct" if you're innocent?//
Because one is concerned with guilty by association and the other is guilty in the eyes of the law. Two totally different things, you certainly dont need to be actually guilty for your employer or sponsor to ditch you.
Because one is concerned with guilty by association and the other is guilty in the eyes of the law. Two totally different things, you certainly dont need to be actually guilty for your employer or sponsor to ditch you.
"you certainly dont need to be actually guilty for your employer or sponsor to ditch you."
Imagine how he could sue them for firing him over allegation that are just hearsay? He's big and powerful enough to. I bet he didn't because they would provide the misconduct allegation and it would need to be investigated probably to prove him guilty!
"The Federal Rules of Evidence define hearsay as: A statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement."
If he was innocent, he should (or I would) be suing here there and everywhere for defamatory. Regarding defamatory and USA law just look at the 1st amendment.
Imagine how he could sue them for firing him over allegation that are just hearsay? He's big and powerful enough to. I bet he didn't because they would provide the misconduct allegation and it would need to be investigated probably to prove him guilty!
"The Federal Rules of Evidence define hearsay as: A statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement."
If he was innocent, he should (or I would) be suing here there and everywhere for defamatory. Regarding defamatory and USA law just look at the 1st amendment.
// Ernest Walter Saunders (born 21 October 1935) is a British former business manager, best known as one of the "Guinness Four", a group of businessmen who attempted fraudulently to manipulate the share price of the Guinness company. He was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, but released after 10 months as he was believed to be suffering from Alzheimer's disease, which is incurable. He subsequently made a full recovery. // (wiki)
Weinstein probably won't be needing that zimmer if he should win the case.
Weinstein probably won't be needing that zimmer if he should win the case.