ChatterBank5 mins ago
Bbc
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Another article here. Let me know if they are paywalled and if you want them I can c&p the salient points.
https:/ /www.th etimes. co.uk/a rticle/ the-bbc -has-ov erreach ed-for- too-lon g-now-t hat-mus t-end-5 3phb05p n
https:/
heres what ITV has to say https:/ /www.it v.com/n ews/202 0-02-15 /no-10- warns-t he-bbc- that-th e-tv-li cence-f ee-is-f acing-t he-axe/
The BBC is a brilliant maker of successful television and it is a respected brand all over the world.
It’s main problem is that it is not independent of the UK Government, and it is commercially hampered by both the slow (and ineptitude) of its governance, and the blatant un-business friendly of the politicians overseeing it.
The BBC can be a world player in the manufacture of quality entertainment - but not as long as the politicians are involved. It needs the best in television and film talent to come and help the BBC to reach its potential - but they are never going to come as long as stupid politicians are involved, an the business is not run commercially and profitably.
Sadly, the noises coming from the Department of Cummings is not about making the BBC a world class global enterprise and profitable, and not a drain on taxes, but instead Cummings and Co., still want to be able to interfere and dictate (and hamper) the BBC, but do not want the stigma of it being a tax.
The BBC will never be independent, because politicians (of all colours) need the BBC to be shackled to them, otherwise no one will take any notice of them.
The BBC has huge potential, but sadly it will never be realised because the politicians will never give it the freedom to thrive.
It’s main problem is that it is not independent of the UK Government, and it is commercially hampered by both the slow (and ineptitude) of its governance, and the blatant un-business friendly of the politicians overseeing it.
The BBC can be a world player in the manufacture of quality entertainment - but not as long as the politicians are involved. It needs the best in television and film talent to come and help the BBC to reach its potential - but they are never going to come as long as stupid politicians are involved, an the business is not run commercially and profitably.
Sadly, the noises coming from the Department of Cummings is not about making the BBC a world class global enterprise and profitable, and not a drain on taxes, but instead Cummings and Co., still want to be able to interfere and dictate (and hamper) the BBC, but do not want the stigma of it being a tax.
The BBC will never be independent, because politicians (of all colours) need the BBC to be shackled to them, otherwise no one will take any notice of them.
The BBC has huge potential, but sadly it will never be realised because the politicians will never give it the freedom to thrive.
I think the problem the BBC faces currently is the exact opposite of what gromit is claiming: it IS independent of politicians in its day to day running: and in the current climate that’s not popular - but if course it is still at the mercy of a government which might be out to destroy it.
Having said that, I don’t think that will happen.
Having said that, I don’t think that will happen.
Ich
The BBC’s programmes are very popular worldwide and the brand is well respected.
Unfortunately the politicians need the BBC for their credibility.
The borefest ‘Question Time’ programme would never exist unless the BBC was obliged to make it by Parliament. Parliament owning the BBC guarantees them airtime, which equals votes, credibility, exposure and recognition. The BBC really would love not to have to broadcast Michael Gove’s smug annoying face all the time, but if it didn’t, its funding might go away.
Which is why this threat will never happen (though it would be for the better for theVBC if it did).
The BBC’s programmes are very popular worldwide and the brand is well respected.
Unfortunately the politicians need the BBC for their credibility.
The borefest ‘Question Time’ programme would never exist unless the BBC was obliged to make it by Parliament. Parliament owning the BBC guarantees them airtime, which equals votes, credibility, exposure and recognition. The BBC really would love not to have to broadcast Michael Gove’s smug annoying face all the time, but if it didn’t, its funding might go away.
Which is why this threat will never happen (though it would be for the better for theVBC if it did).