News1 min ago
Duffy: Victim Of Sustained Sexual Assault
If anyone ever wondered why the singer Duffy went from multi platinum to utter silence, it seems that there is a horrific reason.
https:/
https:/
Answers
A young woman has been allegedly confined and raped -and all you lot can do is use this as a platform for grandstandin
09:57 Fri 28th Feb 2020
Maybe the police were already involved when it first happened and Duffy was able to contain the situation without media attention. I really do hope so. If not, then the perpetrater is still out there and will have seen everything she has said. She would no doubt have been scared to share what had happened to her on a social media platform.
douglas - // Just a thought, they're rhetorical questions so no need for the righteous brothers and sisters to stoke their collective boiler of
sarcasm, snideness and outrage just yet //
They are not rhetorical questions if they are asked to named individuals - those require a response, which they have received.
Just a thought.
sarcasm, snideness and outrage just yet //
They are not rhetorical questions if they are asked to named individuals - those require a response, which they have received.
Just a thought.
//NJ. Why do you waste your time posting on threads which mean nothing to you ?//
They don't mean nothing to me. If what this lady alleges is true she has been the victim of a very serious crime. But I've no idea who she is. That doesn't mean I'm trying to trivialise her alleged ordeal. But she's spoken of as if she is my next door neighbour and that's what I find puzzling. Despite emmie's helpful reply yesterday morning I'm afraid I'm still none the wiser, but accept that she is a chanteuse whose performances some people enjoy.
There are probably many people of whom I have heard in areas that are of interest to me who few on here will know of. If I posted something about them like this I would not be surprised if somebody asked who they were. But I wouldn't suggest that those exhibiting such ignorance should steer clear entirely. Khandro hit the nail on the head at 18:12 yesterday.
The main element of this thread is the appalling allegations that "Duffy" has finally made public and to suggest the question is of no interest to me simply because I don't know who Duffy is suggests that a little tolerance might no go amiss.
They don't mean nothing to me. If what this lady alleges is true she has been the victim of a very serious crime. But I've no idea who she is. That doesn't mean I'm trying to trivialise her alleged ordeal. But she's spoken of as if she is my next door neighbour and that's what I find puzzling. Despite emmie's helpful reply yesterday morning I'm afraid I'm still none the wiser, but accept that she is a chanteuse whose performances some people enjoy.
There are probably many people of whom I have heard in areas that are of interest to me who few on here will know of. If I posted something about them like this I would not be surprised if somebody asked who they were. But I wouldn't suggest that those exhibiting such ignorance should steer clear entirely. Khandro hit the nail on the head at 18:12 yesterday.
The main element of this thread is the appalling allegations that "Duffy" has finally made public and to suggest the question is of no interest to me simply because I don't know who Duffy is suggests that a little tolerance might no go amiss.
"The main element of this thread is the appalling allegations that "Duffy" has finally made public and to suggest the question is of no interest to me simply because I don't know who Duffy is suggests that a little tolerance might no go amiss."
if you want people to think that the question is of interest to you, then make responses that show it is!
if you want people to think that the question is of interest to you, then make responses that show it is!
//if you want people to think that the question is of interest to you, then make responses that show it is!//
All I did was asked who the lady was because I genuinely have never heard of her. I'm not particularly concerned whether people think the question is of interest to me or not and they can choose to ignore my responses. I was puzzled why her tale had hit the headlines (and still am to a certain degree) and thought that finding out who she is might cure my bewilderment. It didn't, but I'm glad I asked nonetheless.
All I did was asked who the lady was because I genuinely have never heard of her. I'm not particularly concerned whether people think the question is of interest to me or not and they can choose to ignore my responses. I was puzzled why her tale had hit the headlines (and still am to a certain degree) and thought that finding out who she is might cure my bewilderment. It didn't, but I'm glad I asked nonetheless.
Just re-read your first two responses, NJ, and it certainly does appear that at the very least you were being a tad facetious.
You didn't just ask who they were. You said the only Duffy you know of was in a sitcom. And you very obviously knew it wasn't the Duffy being talked about on here. It was explained who (or what) Duffy is in the opening sentence of the thread!
You didn't just ask who they were. You said the only Duffy you know of was in a sitcom. And you very obviously knew it wasn't the Duffy being talked about on here. It was explained who (or what) Duffy is in the opening sentence of the thread!
https:/
If you search on YouTube for a song called "Mercy", you may recognise it, if not the singer.
If you search on YouTube for a song called "Mercy", you may recognise it, if not the singer.
Further to Police involvement without pressed-charges;
A fortnight ago the high court ruled that police unlawfully interfered with a man's right to free speech by turning up at his place of work to speak to him about allegedly "transphobic tweets". The police had told Harry Miller that he had not committed a crime but his tweeting was being recorded as a 'hate incident'.
A fortnight ago the high court ruled that police unlawfully interfered with a man's right to free speech by turning up at his place of work to speak to him about allegedly "transphobic tweets". The police had told Harry Miller that he had not committed a crime but his tweeting was being recorded as a 'hate incident'.
Mozz71
You see Roy, ifnypu readnthe link, you then become enlightened as to it's content.
I have no idea what 'ifnypu' means but I did read all the link.
The article read
// I was raped and drugged and held captive over some days.//
Ambiguous?
Your title.
''Duffy: Victim Of Sustained Sexual Assault''
Is not.
How do you know the sexual assault was sustained?
Do any of the words in your OP (other than Duffy and of) appear in the article?
You see Roy, ifnypu readnthe link, you then become enlightened as to it's content.
I have no idea what 'ifnypu' means but I did read all the link.
The article read
// I was raped and drugged and held captive over some days.//
Ambiguous?
Your title.
''Duffy: Victim Of Sustained Sexual Assault''
Is not.
How do you know the sexual assault was sustained?
Do any of the words in your OP (other than Duffy and of) appear in the article?
I should think definitions 2 and 3 here have a similar meaning to "over some days".
https:/
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.