ChatterBank9 mins ago
David Steel
David Steel knew about Cyril Smith's child abuse, yet did not report it to the police.
Is there a criminal case to answer here?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ uk-news /2020/f eb/25/l ord-ste el-quit s-lib-d ems-aft er-chil d-abuse -inquir y-repor t
Is there a criminal case to answer here?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Deskdiary. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Cyril Smith had already been investigated by the police, who had taken no action.
David Steel knew of this.
He recommended Smith for a knighthood years later despite knowing this.
Those appear to be the basic facts.
Do it doesn’t appear to be the case that Steel was covering up anything that was not known, other than turning a blind eye when it came to the knighthood recommendation.
David Steel knew of this.
He recommended Smith for a knighthood years later despite knowing this.
Those appear to be the basic facts.
Do it doesn’t appear to be the case that Steel was covering up anything that was not known, other than turning a blind eye when it came to the knighthood recommendation.
Well, because there was a good chance that Smith might have continued his “activities” in the meantime.
I don’t know for sure, but the reason the police took no action was not I think because they were sure there was no case to answer.
Nonetheless I have sympathy for Steel. It’s the police who need to look at themselves.
And plainly have.
I don’t know for sure, but the reason the police took no action was not I think because they were sure there was no case to answer.
Nonetheless I have sympathy for Steel. It’s the police who need to look at themselves.
And plainly have.
because there was a good chance that Smith might have continued his activities in the meantime
as you say, that's a matter for the police. Steel was a party leader, not a criminal investigator. If the police had investigated and cleared Smith, Steel was surely entitled to regard him as just another innocent man.
as you say, that's a matter for the police. Steel was a party leader, not a criminal investigator. If the police had investigated and cleared Smith, Steel was surely entitled to regard him as just another innocent man.
With the benefit of hindsight - which will be used to crucify him for a short time, and then he'll be forgotten - Lord Steele may well have behaved differently, and that is something he will have to live with for the rest of his life.
There is unlikely to be any further police action because, as advised, he has not broken any statute laws, merely moral ones, for which he cannot be prosecuted, excepted in the court of public opinion.
There is unlikely to be any further police action because, as advised, he has not broken any statute laws, merely moral ones, for which he cannot be prosecuted, excepted in the court of public opinion.