If that is the case......how come the train women has been to court for getting on a train, and these scumbags have not?
——————
This is a case that has IP’s(Injured Parties) which means statements of complaint and witness statements have to be taken, in other words it requires an investigation.
The woman in the train could be dealt with summarily, it’s an ‘absolute’ offence which requires no IP.
It’s the same reason that drunk drivers are invariably caught on say a Friday night and instantly dealt with the following Monday/Tuesday because it’s clear cut: 1. They were driving. 2. It was in a public place. 3. They were impaired as a result of intoxicants. Nothing to dispute, simple as.