News32 mins ago
Should He Be Removed?
119 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by royfromaus. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Facebook is a private company. It can chose to host whatever pages it wants.
No-one has a right to express themselves on Facebook, Twitter, Tok Tok or on any social media platform.
David Icke's freedom of speech has not been curtailed. Only his freedom to spread his message on someone else's platform.
This sums it up:
https:/ /xkcd.c om/1357 /
Whether he should be removed, Facebook have a clear policy on spreading disinformation about CV, so yes.
No-one has a right to express themselves on Facebook, Twitter, Tok Tok or on any social media platform.
David Icke's freedom of speech has not been curtailed. Only his freedom to spread his message on someone else's platform.
This sums it up:
https:/
Whether he should be removed, Facebook have a clear policy on spreading disinformation about CV, so yes.
//What troubles me is that he's being censored//
No he is not.
If someone comes into your house and starts saying things you disagree with, you can ask them to leave, that is not censorship.
If you then follow them out of your house attempting to cover their mouth whilst they're walking down the street - THAT'S censorship.
This is the sam.
No he is not.
If someone comes into your house and starts saying things you disagree with, you can ask them to leave, that is not censorship.
If you then follow them out of your house attempting to cover their mouth whilst they're walking down the street - THAT'S censorship.
This is the sam.
Zacs-Master
So you’re saying you took the time to post a link to illustrate your OP but that it might not be accurate?
What an odd debating modus operandi.
You don't half spout some excrement to make yourself appear intelligent.
I looked for Icke, Shoota, Ike was a typo. The only one with 60000 is a fan type thing.
So you’re saying you took the time to post a link to illustrate your OP but that it might not be accurate?
What an odd debating modus operandi.
You don't half spout some excrement to make yourself appear intelligent.
I looked for Icke, Shoota, Ike was a typo. The only one with 60000 is a fan type thing.
royfromaus
Possibly because the organisation didn't breach any of its page rules.
You can read them here:
https:/ /www.so cialmed iaexami ner.com /how-to -ensure -facebo ok-page -compli es-with -facebo ok-term s/
https:/ /www.fa cebook. com/pol icies
Possibly because the organisation didn't breach any of its page rules.
You can read them here:
https:/
https:/
royfromaus
Facebook said it had removed Icke's page "for repeatedly violating our policies on harmful misinformation".
What have the WHO said on their page that violated Faacebooks policy on spreading harmful misinformation?
I'm not saying you're wrong - it's just that I don't subscribe to their page, so I've got no idea how they've violated Facebook's terms and conditions.
Facebook said it had removed Icke's page "for repeatedly violating our policies on harmful misinformation".
What have the WHO said on their page that violated Faacebooks policy on spreading harmful misinformation?
I'm not saying you're wrong - it's just that I don't subscribe to their page, so I've got no idea how they've violated Facebook's terms and conditions.