ChatterBank1 min ago
And What If They Dont ?...
180 Answers
https:/ /uk.new s.yahoo .com/bl ack-liv es-matt er-prot esters- must-08 3956063 .html?g uccount er=1
Will they be getting down on one knee and asking them in a nice subservient manner to go home, so as not be accused of racism or anything ?....god forbid they dont kow tow to minority demands...
Will they be getting down on one knee and asking them in a nice subservient manner to go home, so as not be accused of racism or anything ?....god forbid they dont kow tow to minority demands...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TheWholeTruth. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If any of them get hurt I trust none will have the audacity to turn up at Guys Hospital expecting to benefit from the spoils of history.
https:/ /www.da ilymail .co.uk/ news/ar ticle-8 412093/ Guys-ho spital- London- remove- statues -slave- trading -benefa ctor.ht ml
https:/
//Cause to celebrate the hospital, yes. Not necessarily the individual... //
An individual without whom the hospital wouldn't exist. Removing his statue whilst continuing to benefit from the spoils of what common sense should now confine to the realms of unforgettable but immutable history is the height of hypocrisy.
An individual without whom the hospital wouldn't exist. Removing his statue whilst continuing to benefit from the spoils of what common sense should now confine to the realms of unforgettable but immutable history is the height of hypocrisy.
Indeed, one might argue it runs counter to his vision anyway. Either:
1. Thomas Guy built the hospital to be used as a hospital, not as a monument to him, or;
2. Thomas Guy built the hospital as a tribute to his own magnificence, and only those who kiss his statue's feet are deemed worthy of receiving the care therein; in which case, he has dubious motives that shouldn't be honoured.
I'm pretty sure it's the former: the statue and the hospital are separate.
1. Thomas Guy built the hospital to be used as a hospital, not as a monument to him, or;
2. Thomas Guy built the hospital as a tribute to his own magnificence, and only those who kiss his statue's feet are deemed worthy of receiving the care therein; in which case, he has dubious motives that shouldn't be honoured.
I'm pretty sure it's the former: the statue and the hospital are separate.