ChatterBank4 mins ago
Yes, I Know He A Random Moron.
77 Answers
But when will our media catch up with this story?
https:/ /www.wa shingto ntimes. com/new s/2020/ jul/22/ isaiah- jackson -arrest ed-afte r-photo -kneeli ng-whit e/
Here's the bit that will get you het up...switch black man for white man and white baby for black baby.
I'm sure you would agree that it would be plastered all over our media?
https:/
Here's the bit that will get you het up...switch black man for white man and white baby for black baby.
I'm sure you would agree that it would be plastered all over our media?
Answers
//Ken4155 Ellipsis for 'Most sensible answer', at the very least. Quite obviously staged and child has probably been told to pretend to cry.// Good grief! What is wrong with you? The 'child' is a baby!! That picture made me feel sick.
12:23 Thu 23rd Jul 2020
> Who the hell are all these 'straw men' you keep talking about??
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/Straw _man
> Did you see the picture of that terrified little child??
No, as it happens I didn't. I read the OP and the article it linked to, and then answered the question. Did I miss the photo? Or have you seen the photo somewhere else?
> the child is INNOCENT!!
And Floyd is dead. And was innocent until proven guilty, which he won't be now.
We haven't got a clue what actually happened and yet the question is why isn't this all over the British media? Here's a comment from "Heather" under the article:
> The mother took the picture actually .this happened in my home town Springfield, ohio . The child is in the father's custody. She defends the man over and over on fb saying "he didn't apply pressure ", "he wasn't hurting him" ,and "I'd never let him hurt my child "
We have as much clue whether Heather's comment is made up, or real, as anything else. At this point, this is all unproven. Maybe if it turns out to be a real story it will make our press, but unless the child was killed by police I doubt it will be as big as the George Floyd story.
https:/
> Did you see the picture of that terrified little child??
No, as it happens I didn't. I read the OP and the article it linked to, and then answered the question. Did I miss the photo? Or have you seen the photo somewhere else?
> the child is INNOCENT!!
And Floyd is dead. And was innocent until proven guilty, which he won't be now.
We haven't got a clue what actually happened and yet the question is why isn't this all over the British media? Here's a comment from "Heather" under the article:
> The mother took the picture actually .this happened in my home town Springfield, ohio . The child is in the father's custody. She defends the man over and over on fb saying "he didn't apply pressure ", "he wasn't hurting him" ,and "I'd never let him hurt my child "
We have as much clue whether Heather's comment is made up, or real, as anything else. At this point, this is all unproven. Maybe if it turns out to be a real story it will make our press, but unless the child was killed by police I doubt it will be as big as the George Floyd story.
And now we have 'poundland panthers' FFF Forever Family Force.
They appear to be another left-wing group that wants to de-fund the police.
Forever family...can I assume they want to distance themselves from BLM?
https:/ /i1.wp. com/i.d ailymai l.co.uk /1s/202 0/08/02 /10/314 47978-8 585073- Activis ts_bloc k_Brixt on_Road _as_the y_march _throug h_Londo n_s_str e-a-5_1 5963618 15444.j pg?resi ze=634% 2C423&a mp;ssl= 1
They appear to be another left-wing group that wants to de-fund the police.
Forever family...can I assume they want to distance themselves from BLM?
https:/
Ellipsis - // > the child is INNOCENT!!
And Floyd is dead. And was innocent until proven guilty, which he won't be now. //
Attempting to excuse one act of cruelty by lining it up against another more serious and far-reaching act of cruelty is the essence of poor debate.
One is not lessened by the additional severity of the other.
There are times when a reasoned analysis of a situation is called for, and there are times when a pointless publicity stunt by a moron should be ignored.
Guess which one this is ...
And Floyd is dead. And was innocent until proven guilty, which he won't be now. //
Attempting to excuse one act of cruelty by lining it up against another more serious and far-reaching act of cruelty is the essence of poor debate.
One is not lessened by the additional severity of the other.
There are times when a reasoned analysis of a situation is called for, and there are times when a pointless publicity stunt by a moron should be ignored.
Guess which one this is ...
There are times when a reasoned analysis of a situation is called for, and there are times when a pointless publicity stunt by a moron should be ignored.
Guess which one this is ...
______________________________________________
Did I guess the wrong one?
Zac, my default setting is far from rage.
Why, (unlike you) even when I'm drunk I'm far from ever 'raged'
Guess which one this is ...
______________________________________________
Did I guess the wrong one?
Zac, my default setting is far from rage.
Why, (unlike you) even when I'm drunk I'm far from ever 'raged'
roy - // They are your actual words, andy...I haven't twisted anything. //
My actual words were -
// There are times when a reasoned analysis of a situation is called for, and there are times when a pointless publicity stunt by a moron should be ignored. //
which you chose to interpret as -
// andy there...telling us to turn a blind eye to child abuse. //
And you think that is not twisting what I said?
One of two things has happened here -
Either you simply didn't understand the point I made, or you decided to twist its meanings out of all recognition in order to infer that I think child abuse should be ignored.
Now anyone can read what you have said, and what I have said, and based on my past history with you, I am absolutely sure which of those two motivated your response.
So either my history shows me as someone who thinks ignoring child abuse is acceptable, or your history shows you as a nit-picking provocateur who loses no opportunity to attack someone to whom you have taken a random dislike for your own reasons.
I know which is true, and so, if you are honest, do you.
My actual words were -
// There are times when a reasoned analysis of a situation is called for, and there are times when a pointless publicity stunt by a moron should be ignored. //
which you chose to interpret as -
// andy there...telling us to turn a blind eye to child abuse. //
And you think that is not twisting what I said?
One of two things has happened here -
Either you simply didn't understand the point I made, or you decided to twist its meanings out of all recognition in order to infer that I think child abuse should be ignored.
Now anyone can read what you have said, and what I have said, and based on my past history with you, I am absolutely sure which of those two motivated your response.
So either my history shows me as someone who thinks ignoring child abuse is acceptable, or your history shows you as a nit-picking provocateur who loses no opportunity to attack someone to whom you have taken a random dislike for your own reasons.
I know which is true, and so, if you are honest, do you.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.