Crime Cases Still Using Cassettes
Technology3 mins ago
Will Priti Useless Actually Do Something This Time?
86 Answers
No doubt more hot air from the Home Secretary who talks the talk but doesnt even crawl the crawl let alone walk the walk.
Either she gets her ass into gear immediately or she should go along with Johnson and Han cock.
Shame really I had really high hopes for "Hang 'em" Patel.
https:/
Either she gets her ass into gear immediately or she should go along with Johnson and Han cock.
Shame really I had really high hopes for "Hang 'em" Patel.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
>A former Chief of Staff has stated that the navy could take them on board and return them to France.
Last time I saw some figures though it wasn't happening. Only a handful were being returned each week out of hundreds arriving.
Once they are here I'm not sure how we can prove to France's satisfaction that they did arrive here from there.
Last time I saw some figures though it wasn't happening. Only a handful were being returned each week out of hundreds arriving.
Once they are here I'm not sure how we can prove to France's satisfaction that they did arrive here from there.
What one does is as many have suggested many times. They are returned to the place they came, i.e. France. And an opinion sent to the French government regarding their authorities' lack of interest in preventing an illegal act, and maybe even aiding and abetting it. One might look at the legalities of confiscating their craft too.
And government may need to reconsider any multinational agreements signed up to, which presently prevents dealing with the situation properly. I don't know why our government is keeping illegals but there must be something tying their hands that they should be repealing.
And government may need to reconsider any multinational agreements signed up to, which presently prevents dealing with the situation properly. I don't know why our government is keeping illegals but there must be something tying their hands that they should be repealing.
When they come in their little boats, this country is so concerned for their safety (the poor things might drown) that I don't know why they (the government) doesn't send an empty ferry to let them come here in safety. Least they can get the thousands of pounds that is being paid to these boat sellers!
//Once they are here I'm not sure how we can prove to France's satisfaction that they did arrive here from there.//
There is no question that they arrived from France.
The only realistic alternative country of embarkation for small rubber boats arriving on the English coast between Folkestone and Ramsgate (where more than 99.9% of them pitch up) is Belgium. The Belgian/French border is near a place called De Panne. This is more than ten miles ENE of Dunkirk and the distance from De Panne to the nearest point on the English coast (which would be in the Walmer/Deal area) is more than fifty miles. On top of that, as far as I know, there are no reports of huge numbers of would-be illegal migrants queuing up on the Belgian coast. I don't think even the French would argue that the invasion that the UK is currently suffering originates in France.
The situation the UK finds itself in is a result of fannying about with the problem for years. People arriving from a safe country (which, by any definition, France is) are illegal entrants under the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. The recipient country is entitled to prevent entry and/or return the migrants to the last safe country they were in. We don't do that. We never have and until we do no amount of "fury" or sabre rattling from Ms Patel or anybody else will make any difference.
There is no question that they arrived from France.
The only realistic alternative country of embarkation for small rubber boats arriving on the English coast between Folkestone and Ramsgate (where more than 99.9% of them pitch up) is Belgium. The Belgian/French border is near a place called De Panne. This is more than ten miles ENE of Dunkirk and the distance from De Panne to the nearest point on the English coast (which would be in the Walmer/Deal area) is more than fifty miles. On top of that, as far as I know, there are no reports of huge numbers of would-be illegal migrants queuing up on the Belgian coast. I don't think even the French would argue that the invasion that the UK is currently suffering originates in France.
The situation the UK finds itself in is a result of fannying about with the problem for years. People arriving from a safe country (which, by any definition, France is) are illegal entrants under the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. The recipient country is entitled to prevent entry and/or return the migrants to the last safe country they were in. We don't do that. We never have and until we do no amount of "fury" or sabre rattling from Ms Patel or anybody else will make any difference.
So much for Brexit then , Brexit was all about keeping E.U, Legal immigrants out of the UK , and before you all shout , It was not , Yes it was !, Ok you have already started sending them back to their own Country , at the cost of leaving the NHS short staffed. Now we can expect boat loads of Illegal Immigrants, at theTax payers expense. Well Done Brexiteers ENJOY.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank94 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles140 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles140 mins ago
News203 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.