If You Wanted Confirmationour...
News3 mins ago
Joe Biden - Trumps Best Asset?
41 Answers
https:/
Have the crats given up hope for the next election? I suspect the next Democrat President is currently largely unknown to us at the moment. Still alll good for me, I have another apple coming from Jim!
Have the crats given up hope for the next election? I suspect the next Democrat President is currently largely unknown to us at the moment. Still alll good for me, I have another apple coming from Jim!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
you never done a podcast or zoom meeting anne? or indeed any meeting where the attendees need to be given a chance to assemble in whatever media it is? All he's doing is is waiting for those who want to listen. I assume you disagree with him though as clearly you are trying to detract from the message by nit picking.
Well, to be fair, given all the gerrymandering in the US the system is pretty rigged in multiple ways anyway. But in this particular case Trump is going on about postal voting, which is likely to be a factor in an election affected by Covid-19, while strangely being supportive of absentee ballots, which are in practice the exact same thing.
Recently, Trump has appointed a new postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, who has overseen a major restructuring of the postal service that is likely to have the effect of increasing delivery times, which in turn could affect postal voting if they have to arrive at the counting office by election day. Whether this is a coincidence or deliberate I don't know, but it's difficult not to see a link between a President railing against postal voting, and the same president appointing somebody taking action that will affect postal voting.
Recently, Trump has appointed a new postmaster general, Louis DeJoy, who has overseen a major restructuring of the postal service that is likely to have the effect of increasing delivery times, which in turn could affect postal voting if they have to arrive at the counting office by election day. Whether this is a coincidence or deliberate I don't know, but it's difficult not to see a link between a President railing against postal voting, and the same president appointing somebody taking action that will affect postal voting.
not wishing to insult TTT
too many times today ( hi TTT sweet one, how is precious today? give us a mwah mwah !)
those who contributed to Trump but are NOT doing so this time said: "we contributors are used to firing CEOs and this CEO (*) wd have gone years ago"
(*) the CEO referred to is of course The Donald
the ed herself no less has asked me to write more clearly
too many times today ( hi TTT sweet one, how is precious today? give us a mwah mwah !)
those who contributed to Trump but are NOT doing so this time said: "we contributors are used to firing CEOs and this CEO (*) wd have gone years ago"
(*) the CEO referred to is of course The Donald
the ed herself no less has asked me to write more clearly
//ConNaz maybe? Or neoConNaz.//
My mozza-English dictionary - on sale at very decent prices at all good outlets - prime delivery available - says
conAZ is conservative - Nazi
neo-Con-Naz - neo conservative -Nazi
cd be by metathesis Con- Neonazi
Naz does NOT refer to Nazweiler concentration camp where all those resistance agents were liquidated including
Noor-un-Nissa Inayat Khan, GC - who came up a few weeks ago ( ? image on a stamp)
My mozza-English dictionary - on sale at very decent prices at all good outlets - prime delivery available - says
conAZ is conservative - Nazi
neo-Con-Naz - neo conservative -Nazi
cd be by metathesis Con- Neonazi
Naz does NOT refer to Nazweiler concentration camp where all those resistance agents were liquidated including
Noor-un-Nissa Inayat Khan, GC - who came up a few weeks ago ( ? image on a stamp)
Far from it, but I can't be bothered wasting much time outlining "all I've got" to someone who can't see even the potential of a link between attacking the legitimacy of postal voting and appointing somebody who is effectively making it harder to vote by post.
Can Trump lose the election legitimately? (Not *will* he, which we will only find out later this year, but *can* he?) Yes. So why is he pretending that he cannot? He even attacked 2016, claiming that the margin in the popular vote that time was fraudulent to the tune of "millions" of illegal votes, with exactly no evidence.
It should be a cause for concern when the incumbent of an office is attempting to destroy any legitimacy of his defeat. I can accept that Trump, who is particularly bad at losing, is posturing, but such loose talk has consequences. Do you think his supporters will accept the legitimacy of the result, should he lose, given all he has said about "the most RIGGED election in our nations [sic] history", and how his opponents will "cheat"?
Can Trump lose the election legitimately? (Not *will* he, which we will only find out later this year, but *can* he?) Yes. So why is he pretending that he cannot? He even attacked 2016, claiming that the margin in the popular vote that time was fraudulent to the tune of "millions" of illegal votes, with exactly no evidence.
It should be a cause for concern when the incumbent of an office is attempting to destroy any legitimacy of his defeat. I can accept that Trump, who is particularly bad at losing, is posturing, but such loose talk has consequences. Do you think his supporters will accept the legitimacy of the result, should he lose, given all he has said about "the most RIGGED election in our nations [sic] history", and how his opponents will "cheat"?
Hmm... Well, I don't think Biden had any real choice as to who to choose as a running mate. There would have been howls of outrage if he had not chosen a black woman, wouldn't there? From what I've heard on radio etc. today there is a triumphalist note coming through from the Dems. on the lines that the election now has a racial dimension and that black people will vote for a black candidate - well, that's how it has sounded to me.
I now think that I will have a flutter on the Trump (if the odds against improve, they were almost evens last week) because of all the white backs where hackles will rise at the thought of a presidential election fought on racial lines.
I'm sure this wasn't intended, but I think it is entirely possible.
I now think that I will have a flutter on the Trump (if the odds against improve, they were almost evens last week) because of all the white backs where hackles will rise at the thought of a presidential election fought on racial lines.
I'm sure this wasn't intended, but I think it is entirely possible.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.