Donate SIGN UP

British Museum Pushes Founder Off His Pedestal

Avatar Image
naomi24 | 09:17 Thu 27th Aug 2020 | News
95 Answers
The British Museum has removed a bust of its founder from prominent display, citing a move to acknowledge the museum’s historical relationship with slavery. Sir Hans Sloane funded his collection of artefacts, books and curiosities with profits from his wife’s sugar plantation. Shortly before his death in 1753, he bequeathed many of his belongings to the nation, and 71,000 of them formed much of what would stock the British Museum.

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/british-museum-hans-sloane-removed-bust-black-lives-matter-protests-slavery-a9686891.html

The museum’s director says, “We must not hide anything” but that’s exactly what they are doing. Hopefully in years to come no one will ask who founded and financed all the wonderful institutions that are now bowing to the Woke because at this rate the answers will have been forgotten.

What next? The renaming of Sloane Square?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 95rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
So his wife's family was a slave owner. So what? He also did a great deal of good. I most certainly do not approve of slavery, but on the basis that everyone is tainted you would have to get rid of almost everyone in any position in the last 200 years. Er - George Washington anyone? It's History - get over it, leave it all as it and think whatever you want to think - then...
21:15 Thu 27th Aug 2020
Is that a fit of the vapours you're having Togo?
every white britain should give there house and all there belongings to an african family and and any indians, restitution for our ancestors evil acts...you may have come from poor stock, even a serf once or lower..
your white and should be ashamed of it, collective guilt see, once we all forfeit our possesions, our sins will be washed away, truth will set us free "hallelujah"
I prefer my solution Fender. We would be better off closing down every British institution that has now been corrupted by the globalist wokery zealots. All of them from the British Museum, to the National Trust. Defund and dismantle them, and deny the parasites that have parachuted themselves in a platform to sneer, and the funds to multiply like the cancer they are. They have seized our heritage and vomit on our achievements. They have even polluted our charitable institutions. Shame on us for allowing it to happen.
Don’t you read? “ Sir Hans Sloane funded his collection of artefacts, books and curiosities with profits from his wife’s sugar plantation.”

These people were SLAVE OWNERS.

How much lower can you get?
//Don’t you read? “ Sir Hans Sloane funded his collection of artefacts, books and curiosities with profits from his wife’s sugar plantation.”

These people were SLAVE OWNERS.//sic

If you read what I said....I agree with you. Close the vile "institution" based on slavery down. Perhaps the bame freedom fighters can do something about the place. I do hope so.
I wonder how many of the Foaming at the Mouth Brigade (FMB) had ever heard of Sir Hans before this post. I think you are just looking for perceived insults. Why get in a tizz about something like this? Don't you have more important issues in your lives than this?
Silly people doing silly things in the name of.....er...who is it this month? Woke! Woke! Go back to sleep your creating a nightmare.
David, do you really and truly feel that this is a nightmare for you?
We have slaves now -- zero hour contracts and food banks.
Atheist; A slight embellishment maybe....
Correct theland, the masters love legions of mind slaves locked into their system and reliant on "benefits" and handouts. Meanwhile the out of touch ancient museum thinks that it is a good marketing ploy to feature the slavers that were in control of Egypt many years ago, and accumulated vast wealth and golden symbols based on the toils of their slaves. The sooner it is shut down, the quicker we will all learn to share and get along jolly well.
allenLondon - // These people were SLAVE OWNERS. //

They were - but none of this is going to alter that simple fact.

The way forward is not to whitewash (!) history and try and pretend that our ancestors behaved in a way that we find unacceptable today, because that simply denies history, which is neither feasible, or a particularly good idea.

If we were glorifying the contribution of slave labour to the contents of the Museum, then fair enough - but no-one would wish to do that either.

It is perfectly possible to accept and acknowledge that historically, people behaved in a way that today would not be acceptable, but editing it or airbrushing it does not make it un-happen, so we must simply acknowledge it for what it is - part of our history.

What these self-righteous attention-seekers don't appear to grasp is that pointing out our historic failures does not make us modern-day failures. History is about learning from the past, so we can do better in the future.

Shall we raze Auschwitz to the ground? After all, it is a colossal monument to the colossal inhumanity that occurred in the world's history, and unlike most of slavery, it is will within modern memory.

No, we leave it there to remind us of just how evil mankind can be - which assists in preventing a recurrence of such barbarity and inhumanity.

The German people do not try and gloss over it, or pretend it didn't happen, or adopt faux-shame for their parents and grandparents - they accept that history is just that - history, good and bad, and airbrushing and editing does not mean that history is where we came from, good and bad, and you can't cherry-pick the bits that allow you to polish your right-on halo, you have to take all of it.

Ironically, virtually every exhibit in the Museum has been taken from its rightful place and the descendants of its rightful owners, so are we going to remove everything in the Museum, or just pretend we won't mention the funding issue.

Selective virtue-signalling is a stain on our modern culture, and the sooner these self-aggrandising morons develop a sense of perspective, and a sense of actual history, not the bits that suit them, the better the world will be for a dose of adult honesty, not adolescent 'look at me' stupidity.
Remove the bust of the founder? Isn't that the equivalent of Pol Pot? Deny all history and start from today instead?!!
It has not been removed, displayed prominently complete with information and artefacts.

Enlightening not whitewashing or erasing.
Remove all bus stops. They say bus.

''Hey you boy!''
''Yeah bus?''
Theland, these are News threads you're adding your 'jokes' to.
Theland - If you feel the need to shoehorn your 'humour' into a serious discussion - try and make sure it's actually funny first.
It says in the article that the bust is being moved from a prominent position so if it's being moved to another prominent position, why move it?
From what I have read it was on a high pedestal with no additional artefacts with it, now it has been moved and is displayed with information and context.
Pardon me all over the place!
Does not a bit of humour call out the ridiculousness and cringing attitude of the museum management?
They have made a ridiculous decision and I ridiculed it.
So sorry you were not splitting your sides :-(

21 to 40 of 95rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

British Museum Pushes Founder Off His Pedestal

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.