News1 min ago
What Is The Real Truth With All These Vaccines?
19 Answers
Personally I am very sceptical one will be found at all in the immediate future. I am also sceptical of how effective and how many side effects any vaccine that has been developed so quickly will be. Just throwing money and resources cant change the fact that some side effects take time to come out.
And now this one we were hinted at being the panacea has issues. No s*** Sherlock.
https:/ /uk.reu ters.co m/artic le/uk-h ealth-c oronavi rus-bri tain-va ccine/p ause-in -astraz eneca-v accine- trial-n ot-nece ssarily -a-setb ack-say s-healt h-minis ter-idU KKBN260 0VB
And now this one we were hinted at being the panacea has issues. No s*** Sherlock.
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.yeah trump saying he wanted to hurry it froo
was a wrong un I believe
the future Nobel Peace Prize winner ( see another thread) isnt one for telling the truth and I wonderedif a poll was held
two vaccines - one (A) Trump says is safe
and(B) one the CDC, fauci or the english CMO says is safe
which one wd you go for ?
actually more interestingly
one (A) Trump says is safe and costs $10
and(B) one the CDC, fauci or the english CMO says is safe but costs $20
which one wd you go for [ no one gets it free] ?
was a wrong un I believe
the future Nobel Peace Prize winner ( see another thread) isnt one for telling the truth and I wonderedif a poll was held
two vaccines - one (A) Trump says is safe
and(B) one the CDC, fauci or the english CMO says is safe
which one wd you go for ?
actually more interestingly
one (A) Trump says is safe and costs $10
and(B) one the CDC, fauci or the english CMO says is safe but costs $20
which one wd you go for [ no one gets it free] ?
Well first off, we don't yet have a vaccine, only may be potential ones. But I don't think that we have ever had the whole scientific world all working at the same time, on the same problem, so who knows what they will or will not come up with, or develop. Should they come up with a vaccine that they believe in working, it will be down to each, to take it or leave it.
// I'm not sure how they are going to be able to tell whether it was a coincidence or side-effect//
you do a v v v long series - esp if the animal studies are negative
surprisingly if one occurs in x cases, then the chance of it occurring again is one in 3/x
so that if one has occurred in a thousand cases, the chance of it occuring is 3/1000 that it is 1 in 300
so if you dont want something 1 in 10 000
to show that you have to do a series which is clear in 30 000
AND - didnt expect this
"The annual incidence of transverse myelitis ranges from 1.34 to 4.60 cases per million, but increases to 24.6 cases per million if acquired demyelinating diseases like MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) are included."
so in the usual run of things - MS and optic neuritis drown out new cases of transverse myeltitis ( by a factor of 20)
you do a v v v long series - esp if the animal studies are negative
surprisingly if one occurs in x cases, then the chance of it occurring again is one in 3/x
so that if one has occurred in a thousand cases, the chance of it occuring is 3/1000 that it is 1 in 300
so if you dont want something 1 in 10 000
to show that you have to do a series which is clear in 30 000
AND - didnt expect this
"The annual incidence of transverse myelitis ranges from 1.34 to 4.60 cases per million, but increases to 24.6 cases per million if acquired demyelinating diseases like MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) are included."
so in the usual run of things - MS and optic neuritis drown out new cases of transverse myeltitis ( by a factor of 20)
I posted on another thread that the fastest vaccine ever developed was for mumps and it took four years.
Records are made to be broken, of course, but I won't be holding my breath. And I won't believe a word the government says about it till it comes out. I don't want to hear how game-changing and world-beating something that doesn't exist might be.
Records are made to be broken, of course, but I won't be holding my breath. And I won't believe a word the government says about it till it comes out. I don't want to hear how game-changing and world-beating something that doesn't exist might be.
I don't see any harm in trying to find one- it is rather important for the world. They are trying every way possible to speed up the process whilst still doing all the essential checks at each stage. So for example when development and testing are being done plans are drawn up for how to produce it to scale asap in the event that it goes live.
The only issue is Russia where they seem to be skipping a stage but as long as they don't export it we can't do much about it.
I think it will take another year at the earliest but will probably take longer
The only issue is Russia where they seem to be skipping a stage but as long as they don't export it we can't do much about it.
I think it will take another year at the earliest but will probably take longer
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.