ChatterBank43 mins ago
Any Boris Fans Still Out There?
Does Boris have any support amongst thinking people?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ politic s/2020/ sep/18/ sinking -withou t-trace -rightw ing-pre ss-turn s-on-bo ris-joh nson-co ronavir us
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by diddlydo. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I still like him but this clearly is not the sort of thing he's good at and he's not taking people with him.
He wants to be seen to be leading but I think he should involve all parties more in the next step- agree a consensus, and maybe set up a cross party committee. I actually think it will still lead to the same measures but they may be more acceptable to the public
He wants to be seen to be leading but I think he should involve all parties more in the next step- agree a consensus, and maybe set up a cross party committee. I actually think it will still lead to the same measures but they may be more acceptable to the public
The Daily Mail also seems to have turned against Johnson recently, ditto the Telegraph, although whether that reflects the views of the country or not is moot. I suspect that Johnson still has some support, partly because he almost died and partly because, yes, it's clearly one of the most difficult situations the country has faced, and most people would appreciate that any leader would struggle.
One question I'd ask, though, is -- is there anything unique that Johnson is actually bringing to his office? It doesn't do to suggest that he's "following the Science", both because "the Science" is not one single opinion on policy anyway and because, if so, that would make Johnson redundant. If nobody else would do any different, then why is it so important that we stick with Johnson? I suppose that goes the other way, ie why replace him if it makes no difference, but what I mean is that for someone to have positive *support*, surely that means they are bringing something unique, and beneficial, to the role. If so, what?
One question I'd ask, though, is -- is there anything unique that Johnson is actually bringing to his office? It doesn't do to suggest that he's "following the Science", both because "the Science" is not one single opinion on policy anyway and because, if so, that would make Johnson redundant. If nobody else would do any different, then why is it so important that we stick with Johnson? I suppose that goes the other way, ie why replace him if it makes no difference, but what I mean is that for someone to have positive *support*, surely that means they are bringing something unique, and beneficial, to the role. If so, what?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.