Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.https:/ /www.te legraph .co.uk/ news/20 16/06/0 2/scots -pay-64 -net-ea ch-to-t he-eu-b ut-engl ish-pay -140-ea ch/
I'm sure the EU will be thrilled to swap her contribution to the EU coffers instead of that of England. £64ph from Scotland verses £140 ph from England. Wow the EU are getting a steal.
I'm sure the EU will be thrilled to swap her contribution to the EU coffers instead of that of England. £64ph from Scotland verses £140 ph from England. Wow the EU are getting a steal.
The Scots on here who want independence, Maggiebee springs to mind, when asked have never answered or commented on the following;
1. Being in the EU does not make Scotland independent.
2. Why should Scotland be able to leapfrog those already waiting to join?
3. An independent Scotland will fail the financial entry requirements.
4. There’s at least two current members who will veto.
5. How will Scotland pay for free university places, prescriptions and any other freebies England’s generosity allows them to currently provide?
6. For such a small part of the union, they are responsible for a disproportionate part of the deficit.
I suspect the Nats want independence but still want our money.
I couldn’t give a tinker’s cuss if they went, but if it means no longer having to see and hear that horrible woman, then bring it on.
1. Being in the EU does not make Scotland independent.
2. Why should Scotland be able to leapfrog those already waiting to join?
3. An independent Scotland will fail the financial entry requirements.
4. There’s at least two current members who will veto.
5. How will Scotland pay for free university places, prescriptions and any other freebies England’s generosity allows them to currently provide?
6. For such a small part of the union, they are responsible for a disproportionate part of the deficit.
I suspect the Nats want independence but still want our money.
I couldn’t give a tinker’s cuss if they went, but if it means no longer having to see and hear that horrible woman, then bring it on.
Picking up on Retro’s point, she’s more deluded than I thought if she thinks the contributions Scotland make will be a gain for the EU; Scotland are a net contributor at the moment, but only because they are on our coattails.
If, and it’s a bloody big if, Scotland get in on the nod simply by dint of the fact they are England’s smaller and poorer relation, they will not be a net contributor; in fact, they will become a subservient client state requiring the EU’s largesse, the largesse they previously enjoyed from England.
If, and it’s a bloody big if, Scotland get in on the nod simply by dint of the fact they are England’s smaller and poorer relation, they will not be a net contributor; in fact, they will become a subservient client state requiring the EU’s largesse, the largesse they previously enjoyed from England.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.