How Thick Do You Have To Be To Believe This Old Pony?

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/54893437

[youngmafbog]

Oh come on Boris & Co have lied to us for months. Doggy graphs mis counts left ahnd not knowing what right is doing.

Cry wolf and thats what you get.

[Old_Geezer]

Obvious nonsense, but these days who would put anything as past those with some power. Hardly surprising these theories crop up.

[Peter Pedant]

you mean they havent debunked the runours
and you ARE still going to be micro chipped

( well it is TTT writing for chrissakes)

[Peter Pedant]

// Oh come on Boris & Co have lied to us for months. Doggy graphs wiv howling errors. Miscounts. left hand not knowing what right is doing.

yesh the microchips bit is true - but none of them will work !

[ichkeria]

“ Oh come on Boris & Co have lied to us for months. Doggy graphs mis counts left ahnd not knowing what right is doing. ”

I don’t think I’d call that lying exactly. Bluster and incompetence certainly.
But it isn’t the government which has been developing or approving the vaccine (it’s not even a British product this one but the same applies to the Oxford one)
If they had then yes I’d be very sceptical!

[Electrochem]

The problem is that some people see something on the internet take it as gospel. That doesn't mean they are thick as you so kindly put it. Your posts are very entertaining and there must be many people who would aspire to your level of superior intelligence in every subject known to man. You are what someone once described as "a self made man, who worships his creator". Your continual use of derogatory words show you to be what you really are.

[ToraToraTora]

so believing that RNA will rewrite our DNA and that Bill gates is behind it all to somehow install a chip to control us all doesn't make one thick in your opinion, Electrochem? right oh!

[ToraToraTora]

what about electro magnetic waves transmitting/creating the virus from a 5g mast? Oddly enough 4g seems fine. Does that make one thick? Right oh! I'd say the inability to do even the slightest research of common knowledge and by default believe all manner of total bilge is a good indicator of lack of intelligence and if you think it isn't that is itself also a good indicator.

[ToraToraTora]

"The problem is that some people see something on the internet take it as gospel. That doesn't mean they are thick as you so kindly put it." - actually it does.

[teacake44]

May be just as thick to be discussing it.

[ichkeria]

When Tora comes across as the voice of reason you realise how bad it is!

Sorry TTT no offence meant.
I think trying to explain RNA and DNA is a mite optimistic tho ...

[bobbinwales]

the dodgy graphs, youngmabfog?. Perhaps photos of tens of thousands of bodies probly would of convinced you abit more. or maybe not.
The graphs probly understated the true horror.
Which ones were dodgy?

[andy-hughes]

Tora - // so believing that RNA will rewrite our DNA and that Bill gates is behind it all to somehow install a chip to control us all doesn't make one thick in your opinion, Electrochem? right oh! //

No it doesn't.

Gullaibility and stupidity are mutually exclusive - it's possible to be fiercely intelligent, and yet still firmly believe things that are utterly without rational foundation.

[tomus42]

That is true andy-hughes. I know a number of people that are definitely not stupid, but who believe the most ridiculous tish imaginable, including various conspiracy theories. I find it baffling.

[ToraToraTora]

perhaps AH but a few minutes research will quickly retrieve the silliness of the thing that one may gullibly have believed.

[ToraToraTora]

AH: "Gullaibility and stupidity are mutually exclusive" - err I don't see how, I mean Gullibility and stupidity are quite often companions, not always I grant you but as I explained above gullible people who have a modicum of sense will verify their initial belief by rudimentary research.

[Spicerack]

If you mean to believe anything heard, seen, read on the aBBC.
I wouldn't say thick, just comfortable with the parody of real news that the aBBC. News has become.

[ToraToraTora]

no spice we are talking about believing fantasy bow locks here when it would be 2 minutes research to refute. Not a grey political/news item that's often just a matter of opinion.

[Spicerack]

What they've done in that article is the same 'trick' so called fact checkers use. I've seen a couple of ABers doing something similar re vaccines.
They put up a strawman, wild claims they say some people believe, and easily knock it over while ignoring more down to earth questions.
Like I say, I've seen a couple of ABers lumping in people concerned about vaccines with flat earthers and moon landing deniers. Mind you, they were a pair of planks.
'He's been targeted because of his philanthropic work in public health and vaccine development'
Lol, looks like Gates paid for the article.

[Electrochem]

"Right oh! I'd say the inability to do even the slightest research of common knowledge and by default believe all manner of total bilge is a good indicator of lack of intelligence and if you think it isn't that is itself also a good indicator."

It would seem that you have been hoisted by your own petard.

cf: "https://news.sky.com/story/at-least-two-dead-and-several-injured-after-car-drives-into-pedestrians-in-southwest-germany-12148078
I say TROP did it........"

Seems you didn't do your research on this, does it not.

Your continued use of disguised derogatory phrases and words such as "scum", "savages" et al show you to be a self opiniated individual.

As an aside, I am all for the roll out of the Covid anti-virus, and as someone who spent the majority of my working life working in science and medical devices, latterly in research, I found that there is a need for proper research. In the early seventies I worked in university laboratories and the internet wasn't around. Young people and many older people see things on the internet and take them at face value. That doesn't make them thick.