Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Trump’s Pardons May Be Dropping Him In The Mire
Muller heavily suggested that trump dangled the offer of pardons for those who refused to testify (against trump) in his enquiry. Now that has come to pass – it strengths the case for obstruction of justice once he leaves office.
Although Biden has indicated he will not pursue Trump for his criminal activity while in office – the tax investigation of his son (Hunter Biden) may make him change his mind on that.
Although Biden has indicated he will not pursue Trump for his criminal activity while in office – the tax investigation of his son (Hunter Biden) may make him change his mind on that.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He's a bit busy at the moment, accusing fashion mags of fake news.
https:/ /www.un ilad.co .uk/cel ebrity/ trump-h ails-me lania-g reatest -first- lady-of -all-ti me-desp ite-zer o-magaz ine-cov ers/?so urce=fa cebook& amp;fbc lid=IwA R3cbGyB NS4vK-i dviIBAc ecY-2vu 9oRRjH3 BUAaNDD Up7zooL h4vQPUv i0
https:/
// It is probably right that a new administration should not litigated the previous one no matter how much evidence there is to support it.//
well when a minister resigned 1800-1830 the auditor went froo da books and surcharged him for misuse
Banks 1801 got screwed for £1000 ( thats a lodda lodda moolah!) and the last impeachment here was Melville for misuse of treasury funds
( there are crazies in America who are originalists - the carnstitootion is unchanging from 1791 - of whom the trump appointees are all originalists - v conservative change ever)
well when a minister resigned 1800-1830 the auditor went froo da books and surcharged him for misuse
Banks 1801 got screwed for £1000 ( thats a lodda lodda moolah!) and the last impeachment here was Melville for misuse of treasury funds
( there are crazies in America who are originalists - the carnstitootion is unchanging from 1791 - of whom the trump appointees are all originalists - v conservative change ever)
Trump has said that he could pardon himself – he could only do that if he had been convicted of something (not some future conviction); some doubt he has the constitutional right to do so.
The same would apply to Assange, although no doubt he could apply pressure behind the scenes for the USA to drop the extradition request.
The same would apply to Assange, although no doubt he could apply pressure behind the scenes for the USA to drop the extradition request.
/but I still believe the Swedish women deserve to have their accusations heard in court.//
hi quizmonster dont often see you here
ope the new year is good to you
Not even trump can offer a world pardon
so I am nore sure if an american pardon wd work for the swedish women. - and if he cd pardon someone cd they be extradited?
Did you see the Roman Polanski you tube bit - the leddy who accused him is in regular contact ! - weird - presumably a large cheque is involved somewhere. The thirteen yr old now the 63 y old.
hi quizmonster dont often see you here
ope the new year is good to you
Not even trump can offer a world pardon
so I am nore sure if an american pardon wd work for the swedish women. - and if he cd pardon someone cd they be extradited?
Did you see the Roman Polanski you tube bit - the leddy who accused him is in regular contact ! - weird - presumably a large cheque is involved somewhere. The thirteen yr old now the 63 y old.
And a happy new year to you, too, PP!
I don't believe the Swedish women I referred to were "paid off". Their cases against Assange seemed to be well-worth a hearing but simply ran out of 'legal' time, mainly because he ran away...as usual.
Accordingly, I cannot quite see the relevance of the Polanski reference.
I don't believe the Swedish women I referred to were "paid off". Their cases against Assange seemed to be well-worth a hearing but simply ran out of 'legal' time, mainly because he ran away...as usual.
Accordingly, I cannot quite see the relevance of the Polanski reference.
'Without Julian Assange, we would know far less about the US war in Afghanistan. Our picture of the conflict would have remained sanitized, and largely as political leaders would have wanted it to be. But since the 2010 Afghan War documents leak on WikiLeaks — an investigative platform founded by Assange — the world knows about the real inhumanity and duplicity surrounding the war. Indeed, thousands of classified military and intelligence documents were made public that year.
Journalists all over the world have hugely benefited from Assange's WikiLeaks platform since. It allows them to network and reveal the untransparent, illegal and at times even downright criminal activities of political and business elites. So it's really no wonder that high-ranking decision-makers fear this platform. And they're certainly entitled to make use of whichever fair, legal measures exist to fight such revelations — though the steps taken against WikiLeaks founder Assange in recent years are entirely disproportionate.
Melzer [ see above] and a medical team previously visited Assange in jail in May 2019. Back then, they demanded that he be released immediately for both health and legal reasons. Eight months have passed since then but Assange's inhumane prison conditions still have not improved.
Thanks to the initiative of Germany's most famous investigative journalist Günter Wallraff, an appeal for Assange's release was published in German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on Thursday. It was signed by 130 prominent German figures, including former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who on Thursday told reporters in Berlin that the United Kingdom ought to free Assange.'
Journalists all over the world have hugely benefited from Assange's WikiLeaks platform since. It allows them to network and reveal the untransparent, illegal and at times even downright criminal activities of political and business elites. So it's really no wonder that high-ranking decision-makers fear this platform. And they're certainly entitled to make use of whichever fair, legal measures exist to fight such revelations — though the steps taken against WikiLeaks founder Assange in recent years are entirely disproportionate.
Melzer [ see above] and a medical team previously visited Assange in jail in May 2019. Back then, they demanded that he be released immediately for both health and legal reasons. Eight months have passed since then but Assange's inhumane prison conditions still have not improved.
Thanks to the initiative of Germany's most famous investigative journalist Günter Wallraff, an appeal for Assange's release was published in German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on Thursday. It was signed by 130 prominent German figures, including former German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel, who on Thursday told reporters in Berlin that the United Kingdom ought to free Assange.'
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.