ChatterBank0 min ago
Ok Welcome On Board But What's All This "Non Binary" ***?
193 Answers
Answers
// *There are, in fact, "XX men and XY women", in the sense that for whatever reason, even at birth the genetically- determined sex doesn't match the outward appearance. This is separate from, but of course related to, transgender, because it shows that XX/XY is very much not "end of". // There are not. In any sense. XX is always female. XY is always male. One's...
00:00 Sat 16th Jan 2021
> Tora says that he is against non-binary people because it changes society. Perhaps that isn't such a bad thing and society needs that change.
It has changed, which is why I made sure that the link I C&Ped from on page 1 of this thread was from gov.uk:
https:/ /www.on s.gov.u k/econo my/envi ronment alaccou nts/art icles/w hatisth ediffer encebet weensex andgend er/2019 -02-21
Society has changed, but some people are still living in 1958.
It has changed, which is why I made sure that the link I C&Ped from on page 1 of this thread was from gov.uk:
https:/
Society has changed, but some people are still living in 1958.
//Togo, crimes are not recorded by gender.//
Then in the same post.
//Crimes are now being recorded as committed by female.... when it should be male.//
Make you mind up or are you "confused"?
Then, despite the "figures" establishing that 98.5% of violent crimes and 90% of sex crimes being committed by men we are to believe these crimes that are not recorder by gender, are being credited to women despite the recording of crime being a totally gender free zone. Good job I suppose or the men(who aren't having crimes allocated to them) would have 110% of all violent crime and 101% of sex crimes on their permanent record. Another question, why do this topic always end up hanging around the bogs at some point? Is that where the fluid bit comes in? Or goes out?
Then in the same post.
//Crimes are now being recorded as committed by female.... when it should be male.//
Make you mind up or are you "confused"?
Then, despite the "figures" establishing that 98.5% of violent crimes and 90% of sex crimes being committed by men we are to believe these crimes that are not recorder by gender, are being credited to women despite the recording of crime being a totally gender free zone. Good job I suppose or the men(who aren't having crimes allocated to them) would have 110% of all violent crime and 101% of sex crimes on their permanent record. Another question, why do this topic always end up hanging around the bogs at some point? Is that where the fluid bit comes in? Or goes out?
It is at this stage that I can't help but wonder whether Pixie, if she was promulgating this sociobabble out there in the real world with real people present, with perhaps people who come from a typical nuclear family instead of one that has exploded into unrecognisable debris, would by now have been invited to go and do something that most people find physically impossible. I also can't help concluding, whether after yet another display of mental gymnastics and verbal contortionism that she would indeed be able to actually do it. :))
Is it really so hard to accept that there is more to the human condition than you personally are capable of experiencing, TTT?
As pixie has explained countless times: XX/XY is sex. There are some technical subtleties, because of course there are -- biology is always more complicated than people learn about at school -- but those can be put to one side*. Then there is gender, which is about how people see themselves and how people are seen within society. The two are different words. Gender is much more nuanced. Mostly it aligns with sex but doesn't have to.
*There are, in fact, "XX men and XY women", in the sense that for whatever reason, even at birth the genetically-determined sex doesn't match the outward appearance. This is separate from, but of course related to, transgender, because it shows that XX/XY is very much not "end of".
As pixie has explained countless times: XX/XY is sex. There are some technical subtleties, because of course there are -- biology is always more complicated than people learn about at school -- but those can be put to one side*. Then there is gender, which is about how people see themselves and how people are seen within society. The two are different words. Gender is much more nuanced. Mostly it aligns with sex but doesn't have to.
*There are, in fact, "XX men and XY women", in the sense that for whatever reason, even at birth the genetically-determined sex doesn't match the outward appearance. This is separate from, but of course related to, transgender, because it shows that XX/XY is very much not "end of".
//AuthorMozz: "Tora says that he is against non-binary people because it changes society. " - err where have I said that?//
Here at 15:28 today:
"AuthorMozz: "Tora, why does somebody you've never met identifying as a different gender to their birth "sex" concern you so much? " - because of the effect it has on our society. "
Here at 15:28 today:
"AuthorMozz: "Tora, why does somebody you've never met identifying as a different gender to their birth "sex" concern you so much? " - because of the effect it has on our society. "
//I'm against all this BS because it's BS, there are XX and XY, end of. The rest is LibFac cobras pandering to self indulgent bowlocks.//
Impossible for you to know that. It's like me saying "I don't understand how a man can fall in love with another man, therefore I don't think that gay men are real." It would be a dickish opinion, and factually inacurate. I had an ex who didn't believe that depression was a real thing. Just because you (or her) didn't share something, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Impossible for you to know that. It's like me saying "I don't understand how a man can fall in love with another man, therefore I don't think that gay men are real." It would be a dickish opinion, and factually inacurate. I had an ex who didn't believe that depression was a real thing. Just because you (or her) didn't share something, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
jim: //*There are, in fact, "XX men and XY women"// - err no, there are XXY and XYY both primarily male but they are rare and not the norm. I accept there are natural anomalies what I do not accept is the plethora of attention seeking weirdos that crave the lime light above all else. Modern society has given them a handle to grasp that's all. If anything they actually ruin the chances of those with a real state of being, the afore mentioned XXY/XYY types.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.