Road rules0 min ago
Looks Like We Were Correct........w H O....
12 Answers
https:/ /www.bb c.co.uk /news/h ealth-5 6011981
"...And that spacing out the two doses, as is happening in the UK, makes the vaccine more effective. " - praise indeed. OK my Anti Anti British force field is up!
"...And that spacing out the two doses, as is happening in the UK, makes the vaccine more effective. " - praise indeed. OK my Anti Anti British force field is up!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.covid - the british mutation is not british
the british covid vacca is not british
covid goes for anything. anti british force field guardy fing therefore not needed
pretty terrible assumptions and conclusions - one dose is not like two doses and so it MUST be like no dose at all ....
and not only on AB
the british covid vacca is not british
covid goes for anything. anti british force field guardy fing therefore not needed
pretty terrible assumptions and conclusions - one dose is not like two doses and so it MUST be like no dose at all ....
and not only on AB
While it is good news that WHO have established that the doses can be taken wider apart than previously advised, it is fortunate rather than praiseworthy.
The Government did that without any scientific evidence to justify it. It means we have been able to vaccine twice as quickly as previously hoped, which is good.
While I am happy how this has turned out, congratulating the Government on a lucky accident is a tad sycophantic.
The Government did that without any scientific evidence to justify it. It means we have been able to vaccine twice as quickly as previously hoped, which is good.
While I am happy how this has turned out, congratulating the Government on a lucky accident is a tad sycophantic.
It was lucky to be sure, but I still think some credit is due. One arguable error that the Government has made throughout the pandemic is to continually be behind the science in its policy decisions, and more generally has been reacting to events rather than anticipating them. It would suck if they are also criticised for being proactive, especially when hindsight even supports that decision.
Perhaps, too, if the decision turned out to have been wrong, the sense I'm getting from the efficiency of the vaccination rollout is that it could have been (fairly) quickly reversed if needed.
Perhaps, too, if the decision turned out to have been wrong, the sense I'm getting from the efficiency of the vaccination rollout is that it could have been (fairly) quickly reversed if needed.