She won her case against the gutter press but that doesn't stop her detractors in Ab from continuing their attacks. It's a pity there isn't the accountability in social media ---- yet.
naomi - // I thought she'd requested the case be re-scheduled for later in the year ... or is that something else she's involved in? //
As I understand it, the Duchess elected to have the case heard by a court offering an 'instant' decision, to avoid the delays, and this is why the case has been heard and settled now.
I fail to see how Thom's Markle handing over a letter in his possession to the mail, entitles the Duchess of Netflix to claim ownership of the copyright? Unless the letter included a footnote to this effect.
But once again the poor dear has had her cherished privacy compromised.
Theland - // I fail to see how Thom's Markle handing over a letter in his possession to the mail, entitles the Duchess of Netflix to claim ownership of the copyright? Unless the letter included a footnote to this effect.
But once again the poor dear has had her cherished privacy compromised. //
You may fail to see it, but the judge clearly did not, and his opinion carries rather more weight I fancy.
Hate to disappoint enemies of a free press but Associated Newspapers and other newspapers have insurance against this eventuality. It commonly covers libel, privacy, and contempt of court.