Anyone Been Watching The Derek Chauvin Trial?

[Spicerack]

I presume we're allowed to talk about it as it's all live-streamed on US tv.

[Untitled]

"Untitled, I didn’t say he deserved to be killed in the street ... I didn’t even hint at it."

Then we are not in disagreement here...

(I do not agree with the death penalty but that is another debate...)

[andy-hughes]

naomi - // ‘.... Because Floyd was a criminal
his life matters less’

It does to me. //

Do you think of youself as judgemental?

[pixie374]

This is nothing to do with Floyd. Fgs- he is dead. This is about Chauvin.

[pixie374]

Thanks untitled x
//Stop saying I'm obsessed with him in an effort to discredit my arguments which you're clearly struggling with.//

Blimey, zacs- there's nothing to struggle with. Have you even given an opinion on Chauvin?

[naomi24]

AH, this isn’t about me.

[naomi24]

Yes, untitled, that is another debate which is why I thought your question deviated from the topic. Still, no harm done.

[Zacs-Master]

'Blimey, zacs- there's nothing to struggle with. Have you even given an opinion on Chauvin?'

You do seem to struggle with logical argument, Pix. Your constant misinterpretation of my words (deliberate or not) and strange assumptions about what I mean (as above) don't show you in a very sensible light.
I've commented on a number of occasions that Chauvin's actions are the subject of a trial. All your comments trying to discredit him are, as far as I can tell, baseless.
As Spicerack commented, it's strange how you ask people to stop bringing up Floyd's past and then bring up Chauvin's. Some may even say hypocritical.

[andy-hughes]

Naomi at 15.48 - I didn't suggest it was about you, but it is about your opinion.

[pixie374]

Not exactly, zacs- you are being irrational. Floyd has nothing to do with this. It's about Chauvin. You not being able to understand the subject, is not my fault. Go on about Floyd all you wish, but you seem to think it's somehow relevant.

[pixie374]

Purely out of interest, zacs...
If I told you that I had battered 3 people to death, what would you think?
If it turned out after, that all my victims happened to be serial killers... would that change your view of my behaviour?

[Zacs-Master]

'Floyd has nothing to do with this. It's about Chauvin.'

Yes, I can see you're entrenched in the same way you are with your strange argument about sane people and brainwashing.

'If it turned out after, that all my victims happened to be serial killers... would that change your view of my behaviour?'

Indulging your strange over-active imagination......
Did you know they were serial killers?

[pixie374]

Zacs, I love you- but you're insane x

[Zacs-Master]

'you seem to think it's somehow relevant.'

You simply can't divorce Floyd from the man who's on trial for killing him. To suggest you can is.......crazy.

[Zacs-Master]

I'm insane for asking you to clarify your motives on your question about a scenario where you're the killer of three serial killers....

I'll let you think about that.

[pixie374]

Not really, zacs. Crime is never- and should never- be blamed on the victim. How Chauvn chose to behave, is up to him- and nothing to do with his victim.
To the second- clearly, it doesn't make any difference. If I'm willing to kill people, that's a problem, even if they turn out to be "not nice".
However, I won't embarrass you, by actually spelling it out...

[pixie374]

Btw- if you want to show me sane people can be brainwashed, by all means, please do.

[Zacs-Master]

I already did. I cited the Waco tradgedy. You can’t tell me that all 75 people who died were insane. That’s illogical, Spock.