ChatterBank0 min ago
Pathway To Uk.
To all the people who voted Brexit to stop immigration.
( Non on A/B of course ). No 10 Announces £43 Million aid to help families
moving from Hong Kong to the UK. we will help families with Housing, Education and Employment to help them settle in the UK.
Says Robert Jenrick, Secretary for Housing and Communities. CON.
( Non on A/B of course ). No 10 Announces £43 Million aid to help families
moving from Hong Kong to the UK. we will help families with Housing, Education and Employment to help them settle in the UK.
Says Robert Jenrick, Secretary for Housing and Communities. CON.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gulliver1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//The right to refuse entry......to people in dinghies.....how does that work?//
The UK has the right to choose to refuse entry to people who arrive in dinghies. For some unfathomable reason it chooses not to exercise it.
//Danny,you know and every UK voter knows , Brexit was all about immigration//
Your assertion is wrong. It was not all about immigration for me. I made my mind up in 1992 that I would vote to leave if ever given the chance. At that time migration from the EU was not a serious issue and it played no part in my decision then. As it progressively became an issue – mainly following the eastward expansion of the EU – it added to my resolve. Don’t assume you know the mindset of everybody who voted to leave because you don’t. More than that, what is your objection to those who voted to leave solely on the basis that immigration troubled them? Courtesy of our membership of the EU, some 450m people had the unchallengeable right to settle here. A large number of them exercised that right. So what’s wrong with wanting to see an end to that state of affairs?
If you want a sensible discussion you need to come up with a decent argument, not simply repeatedly spout unsubstantiated assertions. Otherwise people will take Tora's advice.
The UK has the right to choose to refuse entry to people who arrive in dinghies. For some unfathomable reason it chooses not to exercise it.
//Danny,you know and every UK voter knows , Brexit was all about immigration//
Your assertion is wrong. It was not all about immigration for me. I made my mind up in 1992 that I would vote to leave if ever given the chance. At that time migration from the EU was not a serious issue and it played no part in my decision then. As it progressively became an issue – mainly following the eastward expansion of the EU – it added to my resolve. Don’t assume you know the mindset of everybody who voted to leave because you don’t. More than that, what is your objection to those who voted to leave solely on the basis that immigration troubled them? Courtesy of our membership of the EU, some 450m people had the unchallengeable right to settle here. A large number of them exercised that right. So what’s wrong with wanting to see an end to that state of affairs?
If you want a sensible discussion you need to come up with a decent argument, not simply repeatedly spout unsubstantiated assertions. Otherwise people will take Tora's advice.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
the last time you posted about this, courtesy of LB link, you said that when in London, you could have been in Kowloon, ha ha.
more like the United Nations. We have 8 or more million souls in the capital and they are as diverse as its possible to be.
I suggest if you come to London again, have a good look, its not
all bad.
more like the United Nations. We have 8 or more million souls in the capital and they are as diverse as its possible to be.
I suggest if you come to London again, have a good look, its not
all bad.