Crosswords14 mins ago
Elderly Drivers
'Elderly drivers may face 'annual checks' to prove they are 'not a danger to the public'
they may soon be forced to go for annual checks to ensure they are still safe to get behind the wheel if a new campaign is successful in changing the law.' Express.
Does this make sense?
they may soon be forced to go for annual checks to ensure they are still safe to get behind the wheel if a new campaign is successful in changing the law.' Express.
Does this make sense?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//I think there's a bit of 'ageism' going on here, the suggestion that an older person is too gaga to know that s/he needs new glasses, is ridiculous.//
Gromit said all people should be eye tested - and I agreed. Nothing to do with being gaga, there are a fair few people who simply wont admit the minces are a tad dodgy.
Gromit said all people should be eye tested - and I agreed. Nothing to do with being gaga, there are a fair few people who simply wont admit the minces are a tad dodgy.
Having known of two cases of women in their 60s with Alzheimer's driving ( in both cases their children didn't realise they still had car keys) I think anyone with a diagnosis of any age that impairs judgement should be barred from driving. That includes a number of serious mental health conditions, severe pain requiring strong analgesia, and alcohol or substance abuse.
I am 83 years old and have had a full driving licence since 1960. I have had one speeding ticket 2 years ago for doing 35 in a 30 mph zone. I have been involved in 2 accidents and neither was my fault. A lorry cut in front of me and smashed my car up. The second was a young driver smashed into the rear of my car while I was sitting at a red light. He said he didn't se the traffic lights because he was changing a CD. I have made an agreement with my children and grandchildren that when they think I shouldn't be driving I will give up my licence. I would happily agree to be tested but to test all over 70's would be a logistical nightmare.
> I can't help feeling that the idea of getting older people off the road is a back door idea of reducing traffic in general
From what's being said here, this won't get anybody off the road ...
But, assuming it works, it will only get people off the road that shouldn't be on the road. The issue for the rest is the inconvenience.
From what's being said here, this won't get anybody off the road ...
But, assuming it works, it will only get people off the road that shouldn't be on the road. The issue for the rest is the inconvenience.
///woofgang Barsel, their doctors are supposed to.///
Only if their doctors know.
My cousin was an alcoholic, a chain smoker, and had a bad heart
He went to the doctors once and because he didn't like what he was told, he never went again.
He carried on driving until the day he had a fatal heart attack while he was driving, but fortunately he had pulled over because he felt unwell.
If he hadn't have done that, then other people could have been injured including his young son who was in the passenger seat.
Only if their doctors know.
My cousin was an alcoholic, a chain smoker, and had a bad heart
He went to the doctors once and because he didn't like what he was told, he never went again.
He carried on driving until the day he had a fatal heart attack while he was driving, but fortunately he had pulled over because he felt unwell.
If he hadn't have done that, then other people could have been injured including his young son who was in the passenger seat.
Barsel - // I disagree andy. Why should every person over 70 have to take a yearly test when they have never been involved in an accident and have never had points on their licence? //
Because inconveniencing the few for the benefit of the many is the way society works, quite often.
Maybe adjust those numbers to 75 and every two years - better?
Because inconveniencing the few for the benefit of the many is the way society works, quite often.
Maybe adjust those numbers to 75 and every two years - better?