This was on the news this morning. I don't understand why. All the elderly and vulnerable have had the vaccine that prevents serious illness even if they do get infected, the young don't suffer from it, so what is the problem? I find it very frustrating that nobody seems to question this.
I couldn't agree more - as long as very few people are dying from it, what does it matter? There have been bad 'flu epidemics - but, again, as long as most vulnerable people have been vaccinated and so are unlikely to clog up hospitals and die, it hasn't mattered. This whole thing has now become a ridiculous over-reaction. ' Save the NHS' was the call - OK, it's been...
the young can be affected by it, the ones in India are not just the elderly and frail. We will just have to wait and see what the government proposes, but as far as i am aware monday is the day when we can start to return to some sort of normality.
The number of healthy children who have died is so tiny as to be statistically irrelevant.
Just been listening to a Professor on Nick Ferrari’s show, and she was of the opinion all should be ok just so long as the pockets of areas that have it are identified and isolated and T&T. Also, she said the Indian variant isn’t as spreadable as other variants.
It would be daft to renege on 17/5 and 21/6 for the country due to a few tiny areas.
Some of our cities and towns have large communities where travel to and from India is common, this could give the new variant a solid foothold as there will be some who slip through the quarantine and test system. Until we have absolute certainty that this variant carries no additional risk in terms of vaccine resis t ance, ease of transmission o r morbidity/ mortality it makes sense to hold back until we are sure.
Here, I’d have though South Shields , due to their links to India a long time back and Ocean Road has many Indian restaurants , some next door to one another but this is in Tynemouth, another coastal resort
I use this term again.....madness to be faced with a variant that we, the public know little about except that it is doubling transmission in a week in certain areas and we are still contemplating easing restrictions.
It is only the controls on large gatherings, the huge weddings, festivals etc. Superspreader events. Think about the size of Indian weddings, 200 guests plus, closed location , then they all go back to work in the community, offices, shops, hospitals and some of those guests may well have flown in for the event. I would just keep the size cap on gatherings so if there are infections the numbers for tracking nd testing stay manageable.
if there is another lockdown then heaven help us all, many won't wear it. why invite 4,000 youngsters to a gig in Liverpool, without masks or social distancing as they did the other week. They were all supposedly tested and free from covid.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.