Quizzes & Puzzles2 mins ago
Bj Allegedly Thought Covid Was Similar To Swine Flu
https:/ /www.ms n.com/e n-gb/ne ws/ukne ws/pm-u nfit-fo r-job-c ummings -claims -tens-o f-thous ands-of -lives- were-ne edlessl y-lost/ ar-AAKo pEl?oci d=mails ignout& amp;li= BBoPWjQ
your thoughts? or has this already been covered?
your thoughts? or has this already been covered?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Good God, everyone was struggling to wrestle with what Covid was at the outset and then how best to handle it.....Cummings was part of the team and the decision making process so he is as equally complicit as Boris and the rest. In short, I think it he ought to be prosecuted against the Official Secrets Act for revealing what goes on in the supposedly confidential Cabinet meeting room. Talk about being a duplicitous rat - scum of the scum in my book.
In the privacy of the meeting rooms,, I would expect someone in that position to strongly challenge what they are being told in order to satisfy themselves that the projections and suggestions were valid. Some of that challenging, when in print and not in context could appear callous. It maybe that it was deliberately shocking.
What matters is what the eventual decision was, not how the discussion went.
This disgusting man who broke the rules himself shouldn't be given time of day.
What matters is what the eventual decision was, not how the discussion went.
This disgusting man who broke the rules himself shouldn't be given time of day.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. We were in uncharted waters, Boris was quite rightly very worried about what a lock down would do to the economy, as I and many people were. It was thought it was a last resort when all else had failed. Keeping going on about how many thousands have died or could have been saved is just a knee jerk emotional reaction that helps no one. It is what it is, mistakes were inevitably made, a pandemic kills people, time to move on.
Naomi @ 20;31, "Perhaps he will be prosecuted, Ken." Just been reading up on the situation, Naomi, and you may well be right. Though i think he may have consulted a legal team before today's session. Apparently the government's legal bods were due to pore over his declarations immediately afterwards to see if any of the OSA had been contravened.
It is an offence for current and former civil servants and advisors to reveal official and classified information from any government department if such disclosure is made "without lawful authority and is damaging."
It is an offence for current and former civil servants and advisors to reveal official and classified information from any government department if such disclosure is made "without lawful authority and is damaging."
//Ken, I’d be very surprised indeed if Cummings hasn’t signed the Official
Secrets Act. What he is doing is wicked.//
Exposing the truth is wicked eh? Come on if it was a labour person we would want the truth. I doubt very much DC has said anything that contravenes the OSA, it will all have been checked over by briefs.
Having said that in regard to the OP I think what Boris said in the early days has to be taken with all the very confusing information available at the time. Hindsight is a wonderful thing ask SKS!
Secrets Act. What he is doing is wicked.//
Exposing the truth is wicked eh? Come on if it was a labour person we would want the truth. I doubt very much DC has said anything that contravenes the OSA, it will all have been checked over by briefs.
Having said that in regard to the OP I think what Boris said in the early days has to be taken with all the very confusing information available at the time. Hindsight is a wonderful thing ask SKS!
prosecuted for what for chrissakes?
being there? breathing?
as NJ so brilliantly clearly and succinctly explained in the Hillsborough inquiry - breach of confidentiality aint a crime - offences against the OSA are (crimes)
and are you really suggesting ( yes even despite this is AB) that someone giving evidence to a select committee is committing an offence against the Official Secrets Act ( = spying )
fantastic even for the fantasists on AB !
being there? breathing?
as NJ so brilliantly clearly and succinctly explained in the Hillsborough inquiry - breach of confidentiality aint a crime - offences against the OSA are (crimes)
and are you really suggesting ( yes even despite this is AB) that someone giving evidence to a select committee is committing an offence against the Official Secrets Act ( = spying )
fantastic even for the fantasists on AB !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.